Abstract:Intracellular bodies such as nucleoli, Cajal bodies and various signalling assemblies represent membraneless organelles, or condensates, that form via liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS)1,2. Biomolecular interactions—particularly homotypic interactions mediated by self-associating intrinsically disordered protein regions—are thought to underlie the thermodynamic driving forces for LLPS, forming condensates that can facilitate the assembly and processing of biochemically active complexes, such as ribosomal subunits within the nucleolus. Simplified model systems3–6 have led to the concept that a single fixed saturation concentration is a defining feature of endogenous LLPS7–9, and has been suggested as a mechanism for intracellular concentration buffering2,7,8,10. However, the assumption of a fixed saturation concentration remains largely untested within living cells, in which the richly multicomponent nature of condensates could complicate this simple picture. Here we show that heterotypic multicomponent interactions dominate endogenous LLPS, and give rise to nucleoli and other condensates that do not exhibit a fixed saturation concentration. As the concentration of individual components is varied, their partition coefficients change in a manner that can be used to determine the thermodynamic free energies that underlie LLPS. We find that heterotypic interactions among protein and RNA components stabilize various archetypal intracellular condensates—including the nucleolus, Cajal bodies, stress granules and P-bodies—implying that the composition of condensates is finely tuned by the thermodynamics of the underlying biomolecular interaction network. In the context of RNA-processing condensates such as the nucleolus, this manifests in the selective exclusion of fully assembled ribonucleoprotein complexes, providing a thermodynamic basis for vectorial ribosomal RNA flux out of the nucleolus. This methodology is conceptually straightforward and readily implemented, and can be broadly used to extract thermodynamic parameters from microscopy images. These approaches pave the way for a deeper understanding of the thermodynamics of multicomponent intracellular phase behaviour and its interplay with the nonequilibrium activity that is characteristic of endogenous condensates. Heterotypic multicomponent interactions are shown to dominate the liquid–liquid phase separation that enables the formation of intracellular condensates.

Composition can buffer protein dynamics within liquid-like condensates

Extreme dynamics in a biomolecular condensate

Cellular Griffiths-like phase

Composition-dependent thermodynamics of intracellular phase separation

Protein condensates in the the secretory pathway: Unraveling biophysical interactions and function

Protein network structure enables switching between liquid and gel states

Balancing stability, dynamics and kinetics in phase separation of intrinsically disordered proteins

Programmable spatial organization of liquid-phase condensations

Dynamically arrested condensate fusion creates complex structures with varying material properties

Experimental models for dynamic compartmentalization of biomolecules in liquid organelles: Reversible formation and partitioning in aqueous biphasic systems

The disordered P granule protein LAF-1 drives phase separation into droplets with tunable viscosity and dynamics

Binding and dimerization control phase separation in a compartment

Feedback-induced Phase Separation of Hollow Condensates to Create Biomimetic Membraneless Compartments

Biomolecular condensates form spatially inhomogeneous network fluids

A guide to regulation of the formation of biomolecular condensates

Cellular Function of a Biomolecular Condensate Is Determined by Its Ultrastructure

Emerging biophysical principles of macromolecular phase separation

Biomolecular Condensates: Structure, Functions, Methods of Research