Abstract:Intrinsic disorder in proteins plays important roles in transcriptional regulation, translation, and cellular signal transduction. The experimental annotation of the disorder lags behind the rapidly accumulating number of known protein chains, which motivates the development of computational predictors of disorder. Some of these methods address predictions of certain types/flavors of the disorder and recent years show that consensusbased predictors provide a viable way to improve predictive performance. However, the selection of the base predictors in a given consensus is usually performed in an ad-hock manner, based on their availability and with a premise that more is better. We perform first-of-its-kind investigation that analyzes complementarity among a dozen recent predictors to identify characteristics of (future) predictors that would lead to further consensus-based improvements in the predictive quality. The complementarity of a given set of three base predictors is expressed by the differences in their predictions when compared with each other and with their majority vote consensus. We propose a regression-based model that quantifies/predicts quality of the majority-vote consensus of a given triplet of predictors based on their individual predictive performance and their complementarity measured at the residue and the disorder segment levels. Our model shows that improved performance is associated with higher (lower) similarity between the three base predictors at the residue (segment) level and to their consensus prediction at the segment (residue) level. We also show that better consensuses utilize higher quality base methods. We use our model to predict the best-performing consensus on an independent test dataset and our empirical evaluation shows that this consensus outperforms individual methods and other consensus-based predictors based on the area under the ROC curve measure. Our study provides insights that could lead to the development of a new generation of the consensus-based disorder predictors.

Similarity bias from consensus perturbational signatures from the L1000 Connectivity Map

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Connectivity Methods for L1000 Data.

Correction of a widespread bias in pooled chemical genomics screens improves their interpretability

Defining Loci in Restriction-Based Reduced Representation Genomic Data from Nonmodel Species: Sources of Bias and Diagnostics for Optimal Clustering

On Contamination of Symbolic Datasets

On the complementarity of the consensus-based disorder prediction.

The Robustness and the Doubly-Preferential Attachment Simulation of the Consensus Connectome Dynamics of the Human Brain

Cognitive biases can move opinion dynamics from consensus to signatures of transient chaos

On the distribution of cosine similarity with application to biology

Optimizing in silico drug discovery: simulation of connected differential expression signatures and applications to benchmarking

Learning Gene Regulatory Networks from Gene Expression Data Using Weighted Consensus.

How sample heterogeneity can obscure the signal of microbial interactions

A method to identify high consensus predictions of single-cell metabolic flux

Combining IC50 or Ki Values From Different Sources is a Source of Significant Noise

Comparing Gene Expression Similarity Metrics for Connectivity Map.

Modeling multi-opinion propagation in complex systems with heterogeneous relationships via Potts model on signed networks

OneNet – One network to rule them all: consensus network inference from microbiome data

Discriminating Direct and Indirect Connectivities in Biological Networks

Effective Connectivity and Bias Entropy Improve Prediction of Dynamical Regime in Automata Networks

Exploring 3D community inconsistency in human chromosome contact networks

Power of a test for assessing interlaboratory consensus of nominal and ordinal characteristics of a substance, material, or object