Abstract:Most research manuscripts are not accepted for publication on first submission. A major part of the resubmission process is reformatting to another journal's specific requirements, a process separate from revising the scientific content. There has been little research to understand the magnitude of the burden imposed by the current resubmission process.We analyzed original research article submission requirements from twelve randomly selected journals in each of eight scientific and clinical focus areas from the InCites Journal Citation Reports database. From the 96 journals selected, we randomly identified three recently published manuscripts and sent surveys to those first and/or corresponding authors (288 total) to solicit information on time spent reformatting resubmissions and opinions on the process.There was significant variation in manuscript submission requirements for journals within the same scientific focus and only 4% of journals offered a fully format-free initial submission. Of 203 authors responding (71.5% response rate), only 11.8% expressed satisfaction with the resubmission process and 91% desired reforming the current system. Time spent on reformatting delays most publications by at least two weeks and by over three months in about 20% of manuscripts. The effort to comply with submission requirements has significant global economic burden, estimated at over $1.1 billion dollars annually when accounting for a research team's time.We demonstrate that there is significant resource utilization associated with resubmitting manuscripts, heretofore not properly quantified. The vast majority of authors are not satisfied with the current process. Addressing these issues by reconciling reformatting requirements among journals or adopting a universal format-free initial submission policy would help resolve a major subject for the scientific research community and provide more efficient dissemination of findings.

Streamlining the Manuscript Submission Process at the American Journal of Neuroradiology: Paving the Way for Efficiency and Reducing Hurdles for Authors

Introducing Our New AJNR Early Career, Women in Neuroradiology, and Global Neuroradiology Awards

Striking a Balance: Global Perspectives on Neuroradiology Workload and Quality of Service

Rapid Communication 1289 Academic Technology Transfer and Radiology: A Strong Partnership for the Future

The high resource impact of reformatting requirements for scientific papers

More flexibility and author friendly steps toward publication

A guide to shortening the time from submission to publication in Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

Exploring the Black Box of Journal Manuscript Review: A Survey of Social Science Journal Editors

Streamlining Acute Stroke Processes and Data Collection: A Narrative Review

Drug shortage stewardship: A novel solution for an old problem

Process for selecting and implementing a manuscript management system: Experiences of a new peer‐reviewed journal

Saving time and money in biomedical publishing: the case for free-format submissions with minimal requirements

Reproducible manuscript preparation with RMarkdown application to JMSACL and other Elsevier Journals

Renewing an author‐centric publication process

Direct to Cancer: A new initiative to enhance the author experience

A framework for optimizing diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging in pharmacy residency recruitment for underrepresented minorities

Sharing Patient Praises With Radiology Staff: Workflow Automation and Impact on Staff

Mission control: Incorporating operations centers in hospital pharmacy design

I love clinical pharmacy practice . . . and had to leave it

Guidance on using Medicaid web portals and other electronic prescriptions claims data to improve admission medication reconciliation in critical access hospitals

Writing Manuscripts Better: Part I (The introduction, methods, results, and discussion format)