Reanalyses and a high-resolution model fail to capture the `high tail' of CAPE distributions

Ziwei Wang,James A. Franke,Zhenqi Luo,Elisabeth J. Moyer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0278.1

2020-12-25

Abstract:Convective available potential energy (CAPE) is of strong interest in climate modeling because of its role in both severe weather and in model construction. Extreme levels of CAPE ($>$ 2000 J/kg) are associated with high-impact weather events, and CAPE is widely used in convective parametrizations to help determine the strength and timing of convection. However, to date no study has systematically evaluated CAPE biases in models in a climatological context, in an assessment large enough to characterize the high tail of the CAPE distribution. This work compares CAPE distributions in over 200,000 summertime proximity soundings from four sources: the observational radiosonde network (IGRA), 0.125 degree reanalysis (ERA-Interim and ERA5), and a 4 km convection-permitting regional WRF simulation driven by ERA-Interim. Both reanalyses and model consistently show too-narrow distributions of CAPE, with the high tail ($>$ 95th percentile) systematically biased low by up to 10% in surface-based CAPE and 20% at the most unstable layer. This "missing tail" corresponds to the most impacts-relevant conditions. CAPE bias in all datasets is driven by bias in surface temperature and humidity: reanalyses and model undersample observed cases of extreme heat and moisture. These results suggest that reducing inaccuracies in land surface and boundary layer models is critical for accurately reproducing CAPE.

Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Reanalysis data and high - resolution models fail to capture the "high - tail" part of the CAPE distribution**. Specifically, the research focuses on the performance of Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE), which is very important in climate modeling, in extreme weather events. ### Problem Background CAPE (Convective Available Potential Energy) is an important integral quantity of buoyancy in the troposphere, and it plays a crucial role in the initiation and development of convection. CAPE is closely related to the intensity of updrafts and storm intensity, so it is very important for understanding the potential threats of certain high - impact weather events (such as thunderstorms, hail, and tornadoes). Research shows that when the CAPE value exceeds 2,000 J/kg, it is usually associated with extreme weather events, and CAPE is widely used in convection parameterization schemes to help determine the intensity and occurrence time of convection. ### Research Motivation Although CAPE is very important in climate models, there has not been a systematic evaluation of the biases of reanalysis data and models for CAPE in the climate context, especially in describing the "high - tail" part of the CAPE distribution (i.e., extreme values above the 95th percentile). These extreme CAPE values correspond to the most impactful weather conditions, so accurately capturing these values is crucial for improving climate models and predicting extreme weather. ### Research Methods This study compared the CAPE distributions in four data sources: 1. **Observation data**: More than 200,000 summer - time proximity sounding data from the Integrated Global Radiosonde Archive (IGRA). 2. **Reanalysis data**: ERA - Interim and ERA5, with a resolution of 0.125 degrees. 3. **High - resolution model**: WRF simulations with a resolution of 4 kilometers, driven by ERA - Interim. The study found that all reanalysis data and models showed the problem of overly narrow CAPE distributions, especially in the extreme value part above the 95th percentile, and the biases were particularly obvious. Specifically: - Surface CAPE (SBCAPE) was underestimated by about 5 - 10% above the 95th percentile. - Most Unstable Layer CAPE (MUCAPE) was underestimated by about 17 - 20% above the 95th percentile. ### Reasons for Bias CAPE biases mainly stem from biases in surface temperature and humidity. Reanalysis data and models fail to fully sample the extreme high - temperature and high - humidity conditions in the observations, resulting in the absence of the high - tail part of CAPE. ### Conclusion This study emphasizes that reducing inaccuracies in land - surface and boundary - layer models is crucial for accurately reproducing CAPE. Especially for the prediction of extreme weather events and the improvement of climate models, more attention needs to be paid to how to improve the ability of these models to capture extreme CAPE values. ### Formula Representation The calculation formula for CAPE is: \[ CAPE=\int_{z_{L}}^{z_{f}} g\left(T_{v}^{\prime}-T_{v}\right) d z \] where: - $z_{L}$ is the Level of Free Convection (LFC) - $z_{f}$ is the maximum height reached by the projectile (usually the tropopause) - $g$ is the acceleration due to gravity - $T_{v}^{\prime}$ is the virtual temperature of the projectile - $T_{v}$ is the virtual temperature of the ambient air Through the above formula, the physical meaning of CAPE and its performance differences in different data sources can be more accurately understood.

Reanalyses and a high-resolution model fail to capture the `high tail' of CAPE distributions

A comprehensive evaluation of biases in convective-storm parameters in CMIP6 models over North America

A reliability assessment of upper-level reanalysis datasets over China

CAUSES: on the Role of Surface Energy Budget Errors to the Warm Surface Air Temperature Error over the Central United States

Summertime Rossby waves in climate models: substantial biases in surface imprint associated with small biases in upper-level circulation

Assessment of Wet Season Precipitation in the Central United States by the Regional Climate Simulation of the WRFG Member in NARCCAP and Its Relationship with Large-Scale Circulation Biases

CAUSES: Diagnosis of the Summertime Warm Bias in CMIP5 Climate Models at the ARM Southern Great Plains Site

Origins of Extreme CAPE Around the World

An investigation of tropical Atlantic bias in a high-resolution coupled regional climate model

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Mean and Extreme Climate for the Conformal Cubic Atmospheric Model (CCAM)

High‐Resolution Regional Reanalysis in China: Evaluation of 1 Year Period Experiments

Evaluating the dependence structure of compound precipitation and wind speed extremes

Land–Atmosphere Coupling at the U.S. Southern Great Plains: A Comparison on Local Convective Regimes Between ARM Observations, Reanalysis, and Climate Model Simulations

Evaluation of extreme temperature in multi-RCM simulations over CORDEX-East Asia phase II domain

A Source of WRF Simulation Error for the Early‐Summer Warm‐Sector Heavy Rainfall over South China Coast: Land‐Sea Thermal Contrast in the Boundary Layer

NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE on Equatorial Pacific Surface Wind Changes Around 1977: NCEP-NCAR Reanalysis Versus COADS Observations*

Impact of moisture flux and freezing level on simulated orographic precipitation errors over the Pacific Northwest

A Dissection of the Surface Temperature Biases in the Community Earth System Model

On Equatorial Pacific Surface Wind Changes around 1977: NCEP–NCAR Reanalysis versus COADS Observations

Potential Uncertainties of Upper Air Data over Eastern China during the 1990s in the NCEP Reanalyses

Evaluation of re-analyses over China based on the temporal asymmetry of daily temperature variability