Uncertainty Quantification in Case of Imperfect Models: A Review

Sebastian Kersting,Michael Kohler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.09449
2020-12-17
Abstract:Uncertainty quantification of complex technical systems is often based on a computer model of the system. As all models such a computer model is always wrong in the sense that it does not describe the reality perfectly. The purpose of this article is to give a review of techniques which use observed values of the technical systems in order to take into account the inadequacy of a computer model in uncertainty quantification. The techniques reviewed in this article are illustrated and compared by applying them to applications in mechanical engineering.
Systems and Control,Applications
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to take into account the imperfections of computer models in the quantification of uncertainty in complex technical systems. Specifically, the paper reviews methods of using observations of technical systems to correct the deficiencies of computer models. These methods can better reflect the real - world situation, thereby improving the accuracy of uncertainty quantification. The paper mainly focuses on the comparison and illustration of methods in mechanical engineering applications. The core issues of the paper can be summarized as follows: 1. **Imperfection of computer models**: All computer models are unable to perfectly describe reality, so there are certain deviations or errors. The paper explores how to take into account such model imperfections in uncertainty quantification. 2. **Construction of improved surrogate models**: In order to overcome the deficiencies of computer models, the paper introduces how to construct improved surrogate models. These models can more accurately predict experimental results and be used for uncertainty quantification tasks such as density estimation and quantile estimation. 3. **Quantification of model errors**: The paper discusses how to quantify the errors of computer models. This is helpful for the comparison between different computer models and for evaluating the impact of model errors on the uncertainty quantification of experimental results. 4. **Application in technical systems**: Through two specific mechanical engineering cases (modular active spring - damping systems and piezoelectric elastic beams), the paper demonstrates the application and effectiveness of the above - mentioned methods. In summary, this paper aims to provide a methodological framework for effectively dealing with the imperfections of computer models during the uncertainty quantification process, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of technical system analysis.