Abstract:Computer vision technologies have been applied to an increasingly wide range of applications from autonomous car navigation, to medical image analysis, to precision agriculture. Despite many of these exciting innovations, recent studies reveal a number of risks in using existing computer vision systems, suggesting results of such systems may be unfair or untrustworthy. For example, major commercial facial analysis tools were shown to have substantial accuracy disparities for people of different gender or with different skin colors (Buolamwini and Gebru 2018). Visual semantic role labeling models were found to exhibit societal biases and stereotypes (Zhao et al. 2017) such as frequently associating certain activity labels with specific gender (e.g., associate “cooking” with woman). Even worse, seemly accurate image classifiers may in fact made the predictions by picking up spurious correlations between objects and irrelevant background information rather than identifying meaningful features of the objects (Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin 2016). Many of the risks embedded in modern computer vision systems can be attributed to the use of a training dataset that is biased. Indeed, the computer vision community has long recognized that many visual datasets present varying degrees of build-in bias due to factors such as photographic style of photographers and selection from dataset curators (Torralba, Efros, and others 2011). Using these biased datasets to train machine learning models for addressing different computer vision tasks naturally leads to the phenomenon of “bias in, bias out” and results in undesirable performance. Thus, to mitigate the fairness, accountability, and transparency concerns in computer vision, a crucial step is to start the entire pipeline with high-quality visual datasets that, at least, are authentic representations of the visual world. In other words, being able to detect potential biases hidden in the datasets prior to model development is a key step in guarding against unfair or untrustworthy outcomes in computer vision. While a few techniques have been developed to automatically detect dataset biases (Tramer et al. 2017), the nonstructured nature of visual data makes bias discovery in image datasets particularly challenging. This is because no human-comprehensive attributes can be directly leveraged

Does the dataset meet your expectations? Explaining sample representation in image data

Discovering Biases in Image Datasets with the Crowd

Crowdsourcing Detection of Sampling Biases in Image Datasets

Position: Measure Dataset Diversity, Don't Just Claim It

DatasetEquity: Are All Samples Created Equal? In The Quest For Equity Within Datasets

Dataset Representativeness and Downstream Task Fairness

Adaptive Sampling Strategies to Construct Equitable Training Datasets

Representation Matters: Assessing the Importance of Subgroup Allocations in Training Data

Data Representativity for Machine Learning and AI Systems

What is different between these datasets?

Does Data Repair Lead to Fair Models? Curating Contextually Fair Data To Reduce Model Bias

Revealing the Underlying Patterns: Investigating Dataset Similarity, Performance, and Generalization

Statistical Challenges with Dataset Construction: Why You Will Never Have Enough Images

How to be Fair and Diverse?

Understanding Bias in Large-Scale Visual Datasets

Computer Vision Datasets and Models Exhibit Cultural and Linguistic Diversity in Perception

Uncurated Image-Text Datasets: Shedding Light on Demographic Bias

Image Generation Diversity Issues and How to Tame Them

Towards Diverse Behaviors: A Benchmark for Imitation Learning with Human Demonstrations

Synthetic Examples Improve Generalization for Rare Classes