A Technical Framework for Musical Biofeedback in Stroke Rehabilitation

Prithvi Kantan,Erika G. Spaich,Sofia Dahl

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.00323

2020-12-01

Abstract:We here present work a generalized low-level technical framework aimed to provide musical biofeedback in post-stroke balance and gait rehabilitation, built by an iterative user-centered process. The framework comprises wireless wearable inertial sensors and a software interface developed using inexpensive and open-source tools. The interface enables layered and adjustable music synthesis, real-time control over biofeedback parameters in several training modes, and extensive supplementary functionality. We evaluated the system in terms of technical performance, finding that the system has sufficiently low loop delay (~90 ms), good sensor range (>9 m) and low computational load even in its most demanding operation mode. In a series of expert interviews, selected training interactions using the system were deemed by clinicians to be meaningful and relevant to clinical protocols with comprehensible feedback (albeit sometimes unpleasant or disturbing) for a wide patient demographic. Future studies will focus on using this framework with real patients to both develop the interactions further and measure their effects during therapy.

Human-Computer Interaction

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to use music biofeedback technology to improve the rehabilitation effect of patients during balance and gait rehabilitation after stroke. Specifically, the author proposes a general technical framework, aiming to provide music biofeedback through wireless wearable inertial sensors and software interfaces to assist balance and gait rehabilitation training after stroke. This framework is constructed through an iterative user - centered process, using low - cost and open - source tools, enabling hierarchical and adjustable music synthesis, real - time control of biofeedback parameters in multiple training modes, and providing a wide range of additional functions. The researchers evaluated the performance of the system, including low loop latency (about 90 milliseconds), good sensor range (> 9 meters), and low computational load in the most resource - demanding operation mode. In addition, through a series of expert interviews, clinicians believe that the selected training interactions of the system are meaningful and relevant to clinical protocols. Although the feedback provided may sometimes be unpleasant or disturbing, it is applicable to a wide range of patient groups. Future research will focus on using this framework to work with real patients, further developing these interactions and measuring their effects in treatment.