Sample size calculation for the Andersen-Gill model comparing rates of recurrent events

Yongqiang Tang,Ronan Fitzpatrick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8335

2020-11-22

Abstract:Recurrent events arise frequently in biomedical research, where the subject may experience the same type of events more than once. The Andersen-Gill (AG) model has become increasingly popular in the analysis of recurrent events particularly when the event rate is not constant over time. We propose a procedure for calculating the power and sample size for the robust Wald test from the AG model in superiority, noninferiority, and equivalence clinical trials. Its performance is demonstrated by numerical examples. Sample SAS code is provided in the Supplementary Material.

Methodology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to address the issue of calculating the sample size for the incidence rate of recurrent events under the Andersen-Gill (AG) model in biomedical research. Specifically: 1. **Background Issue**: - In clinical trials, recurrent events (such as attacks of hereditary angioedema, exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, etc.) often need to be analyzed. - The Negative Binomial (NB) model is commonly used to analyze these recurrent events, but it assumes that the event rate is constant over the entire time period, which may not hold in some cases. - The Andersen-Gill model allows for an arbitrary shape of the baseline event rate function, making it more suitable for handling non-constant event rates. 2. **Objective**: - Propose a new method to calculate the statistical power and sample size for comparing the incidence rates of recurrent events under the AG model. - Applicable to superiority, non-inferiority, and equivalence clinical trials. - Consider two designs: one where all subjects have the same planned treatment time; the other where subjects are enrolled at different calendar times but administratively censored at the same calendar time. 3. **Contribution**: - The paper provides formulas for calculating the sample size and statistical power for comparing the incidence rates of recurrent events under the AG model. - The proposed method's effectiveness is validated through numerical examples, and SAS code is provided as supplementary material.

Sample size calculation for the Andersen-Gill model comparing rates of recurrent events

Simulation‐based sample size calculations of marginal proportional means models for recurrent events with competing risks

Sample Size Estimation for Negative Binomial Regression Comparing Rates of Recurrent Events with Unequal Follow-Up Time

Variable selection and estimation for recurrent event model with covariates subject to measurement error

Sample size estimation for heterogeneous growth curve models with attrition

Sample size estimation for recurrent event data using multifrailty and multilevel survival models

The design and analysis of randomized trials with recurrent events

Interim monitoring of longitudinal comparative studies with recurrent event responses

Central Limit Theorems of a Recursive Stochastic Algorithm with Applications to Adaptive Designs

Closed-form REML estimators and sample size determination for mixed effects models for repeated measures under monotone missingness

Sample size calculation for studies with grouped survival data

Minimum sample size calculations for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a time‐to‐event outcome

A Practical Simulation Method to Calculate Sample Size of Group Sequential Trials for Time-to-Event Data under Exponential and Weibull Distribution

A noniterative sample size procedure for tests based on t distributions

Analysis and sample size calculation within the responder stratified exponential survival model

Recurrent event analysis in the presence of real-time high frequency data via random subsampling

Nonparametric Marginal Analysis of Recurrent Events Data under Competing Risks

Sample size determination for semiparametric analysis of current status data

Adaptive sample size re-estimation in MRMC studies

Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited

Sample size re-estimation in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure