Abstract:Artificial intelligence (AI) model creators commonly attach restrictive terms of use to both their models and their outputs. These terms typically prohibit activities ranging from creating competing AI models to spreading disinformation. Often taken at face value, these terms are positioned by companies as key enforceable tools for preventing misuse, particularly in policy dialogs. But are these terms truly meaningful? There are myriad examples where these broad terms are regularly and repeatedly violated. Yet except for some account suspensions on platforms, no model creator has actually tried to enforce these terms with monetary penalties or injunctive relief. This is likely for good reason: we think that the legal enforceability of these licenses is questionable. This Article systematically assesses of the enforceability of AI model terms of use and offers three contributions. First, we pinpoint a key problem: the artifacts that they protect, namely model weights and model outputs, are largely not copyrightable, making it unclear whether there is even anything to be licensed. Second, we examine the problems this creates for other enforcement. Recent doctrinal trends in copyright preemption may further undermine state-law claims, while other legal frameworks like the DMCA and CFAA offer limited recourse. Anti-competitive provisions likely fare even worse than responsible use provisions. Third, we provide recommendations to policymakers. There are compelling reasons for many provisions to be unenforceable: they chill good faith research, constrain competition, and create quasi-copyright ownership where none should exist. There are, of course, downsides: model creators have fewer tools to prevent harmful misuse. But we think the better approach is for statutory provisions, not private fiat, to distinguish between good and bad uses of AI, restricting the latter.

Behavioral Use Licensing for Responsible AI

Responsible (use of) AI

Responsible AI in Open Ecosystems: Reconciling Innovation with Risk Assessment and Disclosure

AI Usage Cards: Responsibly Reporting AI-generated Content

Towards organizational guidelines for the responsible use of AI

Software Engineering for Responsible AI: An Empirical Study and Operationalised Patterns

Responsible AI: An Urgent Mandate

Responsible AI by Design in Practice

Are ChatGPT and Other Similar Systems the Modern Lernaean Hydras of AI?

Beyond principlism: Practical strategies for ethical AI use in research practices

Auction-Based Regulation for Artificial Intelligence

Towards a Responsible AI Development Lifecycle: Lessons From Information Security

Regulatory Aspects of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

The "code'' of Ethics:A Holistic Audit of AI Code Generators

The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool

Responsible AI: Portraits with Intelligent Bibliometrics

The Mirage of Artificial Intelligence Terms of Use Restrictions

Tools and Practices for Responsible AI Engineering

Towards Standardization of Data Licenses: The Montreal Data License

Report prepared by the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) on Publication Norms for Responsible AI