Abstract:Accurate detection of the cosmological 21-cm global signal requires galactic foreground models which can remove power over ~$10^6$. Although foreground and global signal models unavoidably exhibit overlap in their vector-spaces inducing bias error in the extracted signal, a second source of bias and error arises from inadequate foreground models, i.e. models which cannot fit spectra down to the noise level of the signal. We therefore test the level to which seven commonly employed foreground models -- including nonlinear and linear forward-models, polynomials, and maximally-smooth polynomials -- fit realistic simulated mock foreground spectra, as well as their dependence upon model inputs. The mock spectra are synthesized for an EDGES-like experiment and we compare all models' goodness-of-fit and preference using a Kolomogorov-Smirnov test of the noise-normalized residuals in order to compare models with differing, and sometimes indeterminable, degrees of freedom. For a single LST bin spectrum and p-value threshold of $p=0.05$, the nonlinear-forward model with 4 parameters is preferred ($p=0.99$), while the linear forward-model fits well with 6-7 parameters ($p=0.94,0.97$ respectively). The polynomials and maximally-smooth polynomials, like those employed by the EDGES and SARAS3 experiments, cannot produce good fits with 5 parameters for the experimental simulations in this work ($p<10^{-6}$). However, we find that polynomials with 6 parameters pass the KS-test ($p=0.4$), although a 9 parameter fit produces the highest p-value ($p\sim0.67$). When fitting multiple LST bins simultaneously, we find that the linear forward-model outperforms (a higher p-value) the nonlinear for 2, 5 and 10 LST bins. Importantly, the KS-test consistently identifies best-fit \textit{and} preferred models.

Gaussian Process Foreground Subtraction and Power Spectrum Estimation for 21 cm Cosmology

Retrieving the 21-cm signal from the Epoch of Reionization with learnt Gaussian process kernels

Revised LOFAR upper limits on the 21-cm signal power spectrum at $\mathbf{z\approx9.1}$ using Machine Learning and Gaussian Process Regression

Modeling Foreground Spatial Variations in 21 cm Gaussian Process Component Separation

Statistical recovery of 21cm visibilities and their power spectra with Gaussian constrained realisations and Gibbs sampling

What can we learn about Reionization astrophysical parameters using Gaussian Process Regression?

FlexKnot and Gaussian Process for 21 cm global signal analysis and foreground separation

Contamination of the Epoch of Reionization power spectrum in the presence of foregrounds

Cosmic variance suppression in radiation-hydrodynamic modeling of the reionization-era 21-cm signal

Predictions for the 21cm-galaxy cross-power spectrum observable with LOFAR and Subaru

The Effect of Foreground Mitigation Strategy on EoR Window Recovery

Beyond the horizon: Quantifying the full sky foreground wedge in the cylindrical power spectrum

Cosmic variance suppression in radiation-hydrodynamic modelling of the reionization-era 21-cm signal

Fitting and Comparing Galactic Foreground Models for Unbiased 21-cm Cosmology

The Scale of the Problem: Recovering Images of Reionization with Generalized Morphological Component Analysis

Exploring the effect of different cosmologies on the Epoch of Reionization 21-cm signal with POLAR

Foreground Removal Usingfastica: a Showcase of LOFAR-EoR

Influence of sources with a spectral peak in the detection of Cosmic Dawn and Epoch of Reionization

A General Bayesian Framework to Account for Foreground Map Errors in Global 21-cm Experiments

Expanded Generalized Needlet Internal Linear Combination (eGNILC) Framework for the 21-cm Foreground Removal