Abstract:Non-pharmaceutical measures such as social distancing, can play an important role to control an epidemic in the absence of vaccinations. In this paper, we study the impact of social distancing on epidemics for which it is executable. We use a mathematical model combining human mobility and disease spreading. For the mobility dynamics, we design an agent based model consisting of pedestrian dynamics with a novel type of force to resemble social distancing in crowded sites. For the spreading dynamics, we consider the compartmental SIE dynamics plus an indirect transmission with the footprints of the infectious pedestrians being the contagion factor. We show that the increase in the intensity of social distancing has a significant effect on the exposure risk. By classifying the population into social distancing abiders and non-abiders, we conclude that the practice of social distancing, even by a minority of potentially infectious agents, results in a drastic change on the population exposure risk, but reduces the effectiveness of the protocols when practiced by the rest of the population. Furthermore, we observe that for contagions which the indirect transmission is more significant, the effectiveness of social distancing would be reduced. This study can provide a quantitative guideline for policy-making on exposure risk reduction.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the impact of social distance on disease transmission in pedestrian dynamics. Specifically, by combining human movement patterns and disease transmission models, the author studied how social distancing measures can control the development of the epidemic in the absence of vaccines. The main objectives of the paper are: 1. **Evaluate the effectiveness of social distancing**: Use a mathematical model to study the effect of social distancing on reducing the risk of disease transmission. This model takes into account not only direct person - to - person contact transmission but also indirect environmental transmission. 2. **Design a new social distancing force**: Introduce a new social distancing force in the pedestrian dynamics model to simulate the behavior of people keeping a certain distance in crowded places. 3. **Analyze the effects in different scenarios**: By classifying the population into those who abide by social distancing and those who do not, study the effectiveness of social distancing measures under different infection parameters. 4. **Provide policy recommendations**: Based on the results of the model, provide quantitative guidance for policymakers to reduce the risk of exposure in public places. ### Main research content - **Model construction**: - **Pedestrian dynamics**: Use an agent - based model to simulate the walking patterns of pedestrians in a closed environment and introduce a new social distancing force. - **Disease transmission**: Adopt the SIE (Susceptible, Infectious, Exposed) model, considering both direct and indirect transmission methods. - **Parameter settings**: - **Social distance intensity** (σ): Control the distance maintained between pedestrians. - **Population density**: Study the feasibility of social distancing under different densities. - **Infection probabilities** (αp and αe): Represent the probabilities of direct and indirect transmission respectively. - **Result analysis**: - **The impact of social distancing on direct transmission**: Increasing the social distance intensity significantly reduces the risk of direct transmission. - **The impact of social distancing on indirect transmission**: In some cases, social distancing may increase the risk of indirect transmission. - **The universality of social distancing**: Even if only a few potential infectors abide by social distancing, it can significantly reduce the overall exposure risk, but the effectiveness of this measure will decrease as the compliance of others declines. ### Conclusions - **The effectiveness of social distancing**: Social distancing is very effective in controlling direct transmission, but under certain parameter conditions, indirect transmission may offset its effect. - **Policy recommendations**: Provide quantitative guidelines for policymakers to help them reduce the risk of disease transmission in public places, for example, by adjusting population density and regularly cleaning and disinfecting the environment. ### Formula display - **Personal force**: \[ F_{\text{pers}}^i = m_i\frac{v_0^i - v_i}{\tau} \] where \(v_0^i\) is the comfortable speed, \(v_i\) is the current speed, \(m_i\) is the mass, and \(\tau\) is the reaction time. - **Social force**: \[ F_{\text{soc}}^{ij} = \kappa\sigma_i e^{-r_{ij}/\sigma_i}\hat{r}_{ij} \] where \(r_{ij}\) is the relative distance between two pedestrians, \(\hat{r}_{ij}\) is the unit vector pointing from pedestrian \(j\) to pedestrian \(i\), \(\sigma_i\) represents the degree to which pedestrian \(i\) abides by social distancing, and \(\kappa\) is a constant. - **Barrier avoidance force**: \[ F_{\text{bar}}^{iw} = \kappa_w\sigma_w e^{-r_{iw}/\sigma_w}\hat{r}_{iw} \] where \(r_{iw}\)

Social distancing in pedestrian dynamics and its effect on disease spreading