Explaining Gender Differences in Academics' Career Trajectories

Aniko Hannak,Kenneth Joseph,Andrei Cimpian,Daniel B. Larremore
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.10830
2020-09-23
Abstract:Academic fields exhibit substantial levels of gender segregation. To date, most attempts to explain this persistent global phenomenon have relied on limited cross-sections of data from specific countries, fields, or career stages. Here we used a global longitudinal dataset assembled from profiles on <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://ORCID.org" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> to investigate which characteristics of a field predict gender differences among the academics who leave and join that field. Only two field characteristics consistently predicted such differences: (1) the extent to which a field values raw intellectual talent ("brilliance") and (2) whether a field is in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Women more than men moved away from brilliance-oriented and STEM fields, and men more than women moved toward these fields. Our findings suggest that stereotypes associating brilliance and other STEM-relevant traits with men more than women play a key role in maintaining gender segregation across academia.
Social and Information Networks
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the root cause of gender segregation in academia. Specifically, the authors used a global longitudinal data set to explore which field characteristics can predict gender differences between women and men when they enter or leave an academic field. The paper focuses particularly on two key factors: (1) the degree to which a field values "talent" or "intelligence"; (2) whether the field belongs to the STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) fields. The study found that women are more likely to move away from fields that value talent and are STEM - related than men, while men are more likely to shift towards these fields. This indicates that, compared with men, women are less influenced by gender stereotypes related to these fields, which assume that men possess more of the characteristics of these fields than women, thus leading to the persistent gender segregation in academia.