The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care
Matthieu Komorowski,Leo A. Celi,Omar Badawi,Anthony C. Gordon,A. Aldo Faisal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0213-5
IF: 82.9
2018-10-22
Nature Medicine
Abstract:Sepsis is the third leading cause of death worldwide and the main cause of mortality in hospitals<sup><a data-track="click" data-track-action="reference anchor" data-track-label="link" data-test="citation-ref" title="Gotts, J. E. & Matthay, M. A. Sepsis: pathophysiology and clinical management. Br. Med. J. 353, i1585 (2016)." href="#ref-CR1" id="ref-link-section-d3911e509">1</a>,<a data-track="click" data-track-action="reference anchor" data-track-label="link" data-test="citation-ref" title="Torio, C. M. & Andrews, R. M. National Inpatient Hospital Costs: The Most Expensive Conditions by Payer, 2011: Statistical Brief #160. in Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs (Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USA, 2013)." href="#ref-CR2" id="ref-link-section-d3911e509_1">2</a>,<a data-track="click" data-track-action="reference anchor" data-track-label="link" data-test="citation-ref" aria-label="Reference 3" title="Liu, V. et al. Hospital deaths in patients with sepsis from 2 independent cohorts. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 312, 90–92 (2014)." href="/articles/s41591-018-0213-5#ref-CR3" id="ref-link-section-d3911e512">3</a></sup>, but the best treatment strategy remains uncertain. In particular, evidence suggests that current practices in the administration of intravenous fluids and vasopressors are suboptimal and likely induce harm in a proportion of patients<sup><a data-track="click" data-track-action="reference anchor" data-track-label="link" data-test="citation-ref" aria-label="Reference 1" title="Gotts, J. E. & Matthay, M. A. Sepsis: pathophysiology and clinical management. Br. Med. J. 353, i1585 (2016)." href="/articles/s41591-018-0213-5#ref-CR1" id="ref-link-section-d3911e516">1</a>,<a data-track="click" data-track-action="reference anchor" data-track-label="link" data-test="citation-ref" title="Byrne, L. & Van Haren, F. Fluid resuscitation in human sepsis: time to rewrite history? Ann. Intensive Care 7, 4 (2017)." href="#ref-CR4" id="ref-link-section-d3911e519">4</a>,<a data-track="click" data-track-action="reference anchor" data-track-label="link" data-test="citation-ref" title="Marik, P. E. The demise of early goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 59, 561–567 (2015)." href="#ref-CR5" id="ref-link-section-d3911e519_1">5</a>,<a data-track="click" data-track-action="reference anchor" data-track-label="link" data-test="citation-ref" aria-label="Reference 6" title="Marik, P. & Bellomo, R. A rational approach to fluid therapy in sepsis. Br. J. Anaesth. 116, 339–349 (2016)." href="/articles/s41591-018-0213-5#ref-CR6" id="ref-link-section-d3911e522">6</a></sup>. To tackle this sequential decision-making problem, we developed a reinforcement learning agent, the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Clinician, which extracted implicit knowledge from an amount of patient data that exceeds by many-fold the life-time experience of human clinicians and learned optimal treatment by analyzing a myriad of (mostly suboptimal) treatment decisions. We demonstrate that the value of the AI Clinician’s selected treatment is on average reliably higher than human clinicians. In a large validation cohort independent of the training data, mortality was lowest in patients for whom clinicians’ actual doses matched the AI decisions. Our model provides individualized and clinically interpretable treatment decisions for sepsis that could improve patient outcomes.
biochemistry & molecular biology,cell biology,medicine, research & experimental