Abstract:In the first paper of this series, we proposed a model-independent framework for characterising the architecture of planetary systems at the system level. There are four classes of planetary system architecture: similar, mixed, anti-ordered, and ordered. In this paper, we investigate the formation pathways leading to these four architecture classes. To understand the role of nature versus nurture in sculpting the final (mass) architecture of a system, we apply our architecture framework to synthetic planetary systems -- formed via core-accretion -- using the Bern model. General patterns emerge in the formation pathways of the four architecture classes. Almost all planetary systems emerging from protoplanetary disks whose initial solid mass was less than one Jupiter mass are similar. Systems emerging from heavier disks may become mixed, anti-ordered, or ordered. Increasing dynamical interactions (planet-planet, planet-disk) tends to shift a system's architecture from mixed to anti-ordered to ordered. Our model predicts the existence of a new metallicity-architecture correlation. Similar systems have very high occurrence around low-metallicity stars. The occurrence of the anti-ordered and ordered classes increases with increasing metallicity. The occurrence of mixed architecture first increases and then decreases with increasing metallicity. In our synthetic planetary systems, the role of nature is disentangled from the role of nurture. Nature (or initial conditions) pre-determines whether the architecture of a system becomes similar; otherwise nurture influences whether a system becomes mixed, anti-ordered, or ordered. We propose the `Aryabhata formation scenario' to explain some planetary systems which host only water-rich worlds. We finish this paper with a discussion of future observational and theoretical works that may support or refute the results of this paper.

Nature vs. nurture: a Bayesian framework for assessing apparent correlations between planetary orbital properties and stellar ages

No Signature of the Birth Environment of Exoplanets from Their Host Stars' Mahalanobis Phase Space

The signatures of the parental cluster on field planetary systems

Age analysis of extrasolar planets: Insight from stellar isochrone models

A link between rocky exoplanet composition and stellar age

A Bayesian Monte Carlo assessment of orbital stability in the late stages of planetary system formation

A framework for the architecture of exoplanetary systems. II. Nature versus nurture: Emergent formation pathways of architecture classes

Constraints on Evolutionary Timescales for M Dwarf Planets from Dynamical Stability Arguments

The Prevalence of Resonance Among Young, Close-in Planets

Planet Occurrence Rate Correlated to Stellar Dynamical History: Evidence from Kepler and Gaia

The Impact of Stellar Clustering on the Observed Multiplicity and Orbital Periods of Planetary Systems

Tuning the Rate of Tightly Packed Systems To Produce Planet Occurrence Trends with Galactic Height

Stellar clustering shapes the architectures of planetary systems

Ages for exoplanet host stars

Resonant and Ultra-short-period Planet Systems are at Opposite Ends of the Exoplanet Age Distribution

Planets Across Space and Time (PAST). IV. the Occurrence and Architecture of Kepler Planetary Systems As a Function of Kinematic Age Revealed by the LAMOST-Gaia-Kepler Sample

Not the Birth Cluster: the Stellar Clustering that Shapes Planetary Systems is Generated by Galactic-Dynamical Perturbations

The influence of Jupiter, Mars and Venus on Earth's orbital evolution

Towards age/rotation/magnetic activity relation with seismology