Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

CheckDP: An Automated and Integrated Approach for Proving Differential Privacy or Finding Precise Counterexamples

LightDP: Towards Automating Differential Privacy Proofs

Beyond the Calibration Point: Mechanism Comparison in Differential Privacy

DP-Auditorium: a Large Scale Library for Auditing Differential Privacy

Verified Foundations for Differential Privacy

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Bounded and Unbiased Composite Differential Privacy

Debugging Differential Privacy: A Case Study for Privacy Auditing

Differentially Private Algorithms for Statistical Verification of Cyber-Physical Systems

Deciding Differential Privacy for Programs with Finite Inputs and Outputs

Smoothed Differential Privacy

Differential Privacy Made Easy

Synthesizing Tight Privacy and Accuracy Bounds via Weighted Model Counting

Privacy accounting $\varepsilon$conomics: Improving differential privacy composition via a posteriori bounds

Towards Separating Computational and Statistical Differential Privacy

A New Analysis of Differential Privacy's Generalization Guarantees

Reviewing and Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy

A General Framework for Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning

Wasserstein Differential Privacy

Advancing Differential Privacy: Where We Are Now and Future Directions for Real-World Deployment

Auditing $f$-Differential Privacy in One Run