Abstract:The coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) pandemic has impacted all aspects of our population. The "Troubling Trichotomy" of what can be done technologically , what should be done ethicall y, and what must be done legally is a reality during these unusual circumstances. Recent ethical considerations regarding allocation of scarce resources, such as mechanical ventilators, have been proposed. These can apply to other disciplines such as nutrition support, although decisions regarding nutrition support have a diminished potential for devastating outcomes. The principal values and goals leading to an ethical framework for a uniform, fair, and objective approach are reviewed in this article, with a focus on nutrition support. Some historical aspects of shortages in nutrition supplies and products during normal circumstances, as well as others during national crises, are outlined. The development and implementation of protocols using a scoring system seems best addressed by multidisciplinary ethics and triage committees with synergistic but disparate functions. Triage committees should alleviate the burdens of unilateral decisions by the healthcare team caring for patients. The treating team should make every attempt to have patients and the public at large update or execute/develop advance directives. Legal considerations, as the third component of the Troubling Trichotomy, are of some concern when rationing care. The likelihood that criminal or civil charges could be brought against individual healthcare professionals or institutions can be minimized, if fair protocols are uniformly applied and deliberations well documented. IntroductionThe unwelcome arrival of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐Co‐V2), the cause of the coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) pandemic, has led healthcare professionals to face situations that were given little, if any, attention in the past. Discussions and policy‐making regarding the management of scarce or absent resources, such as ventilators, have become commonplace. Taking into consideration that the situations in different regions are evolving in various ways, this article will attempt to summarize the impact of the pandemic on nutrition support practice. The authors provide suggestions for management of nutrition support resources and how multidisciplinary bioethics or triage committees can help direct decisions. Other articles have provided nutrition recommendations for providing care to patients with COVID‐19.1 This article does not review nutrition support prescriptions—when and what to feed—rather it focuses on the ethics issues related to resources. The considerations presented are based on what is currently known. These are highly likely to change as we gain experience with COVID‐19. Vigilance is necessary, as this pandemic is different from any prior influenza outbreaks. BackgroundThe COVID‐19 pandemic has presented us with the Troubling Trichotomy2—namely, what can be done technologically , what should be done ethically , and what must be done legally . Technologically, efforts are underway to prevent, manage, and hopefully eradicate COVID‐19. These include, for example, mitigation practices with the population and medical components that include personal hygiene, social distancing, personal protective equipment, sheltering in place, possible use of antiviral medications, convalescent plasma, and vaccines. The role that nutrition support interventions play remains undefined. Traditionally, medical‐ethical decision‐making in the United States has been guided by the 4 principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and distributive justice (fairness in the allocation of goods). Whether this last principle refers to the actual possession of or equal access to those goods, or even if possession of the good is a privilege and not a right, it is subject to debate. Autonomy, the paramount principle that should be respected under all circumstances, may be superseded by any of the other 3 in times of limited resources. Ethical principles dictate the allocation of resources when they are scarce in such a way to provide the best care to the greatest number or, conversely, to decrease the number who will be harmed. The interest of the community at large may need to supersede individual interests. This problem was described by Gos -Abstract Truncated-

Fair Allocation of Vaccines, Ventilators and Antiviral Treatments: Leaving No Ethical Value Behind in Health Care Rationing

The Right to Health and Resource Allocation. Who Gets What and Why in the COVID-19 Pandemic

An ethical framework for global vaccine allocation

Errors in Converting Principles to Protocols: Where the Bioethics of U.S. Covid‐19 Vaccine Allocation Went Wrong

Operational Recommendations for Scarce Resource Allocation in a Public Health Crisis

Who Should Receive Life Support During a Public Health Emergency? Using Ethical Principles to Improve Allocation Decisions

Fair and Diverse Allocation of Scarce Resources

Fair Dynamic Rationing

Investigating ethical tradeoffs in crisis standards of care through simulation of ventilator allocation protocols

Fair Healthcare Rationing to Maximize Dynamic Utilities

Balancing the Benefits of Vaccination: an Envy-Free Strategy

Equitable resource allocation in health emergencies: addressing racial disparities and ethical dilemmas

Protect or prevent? A practicable framework for the dilemmas of COVID-19 vaccine prioritization

Ethical Framework for Nutrition Support Resource Allocation During Shortages: Lessons From COVID‐19

Fairness versus efficiency of vaccine allocation strategies

Allocation of Mechanical Ventilators During a Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study of Perceptions Among Japanese Health Care Workers and the General Public

How to Fairly Allocate Scarce Medical Resources: Ethical Argumentation under Scrutiny by Health Professionals and Lay People

An ethical analysis of clinical triage protocols and decision-making frameworks: what do the principles of justice, freedom, and a disability rights approach demand of us?

Strategic COVID-19 vaccine distribution can simultaneously elevate social utility and equity

Ethics of resource allocation in a public health emergency context

Value choices in European COVID-19 vaccination schedules: how vaccination prioritization differs from other forms of priority setting