Abstract:Does every Boolean tautology have a short propositional-calculus proof? Here, a propositional-calculus (i.e. Frege) proof is any proof starting from a set of axioms and deriving new Boolean formulas using a fixed set of sound derivation rules. Establishing any super-polynomial size lower bound on Frege proofs (in terms of the size of the formula proved) is a major open problem in proof complexity, and among a handful of fundamental hardness questions in complexity theory by and large. Non-commutative arithmetic formulas, on the other hand, constitute a quite weak computational model, for which exponential-size lower bounds were shown already back in 1991 by Nisan [20], using a particularly transparent argument. In this work we show that Frege lower bounds in fact follow from corresponding size lower bounds on non-commutative formulas computing certain polynomials (and that such lower bounds on non-commutative formulas must exist, unless NP=coNP ). More precisely, we demonstrate a natural association between tautologies T to non-commutative polynomials p , such that: •if T has a polynomial-size Frege proof then p has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula; and conversely, when T is a DNF, if p has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula over GF (2) then T has a Frege proof of quasi-polynomial size. The argument is a characterization of Frege proofs as non-commutative formulas: we show that the Frege system is (quasi-) polynomially equivalent to a non-commutative Ideal Proof System (IPS), following the recent work of Grochow and Pitassi [10] that introduced a propositional proof system in which proofs are arithmetic circuits, and the work in [35] that considered adding the commutator as an axiom in algebraic propositional proof systems. This gives a characterization of propositional Frege proofs in terms of (non-commutative) arithmetic formulas that is tighter than (the formula version of IPS) in Grochow and Pitassi [10], in the following sense: (i) The non-commutative IPS is polynomial-time checkable -- whereas the original IPS was checkable in probabilistic polynomial-time; and (ii) Frege proofs unconditionally quasi-polynomially simulate the non-commutative IPS -- whereas Frege was shown to efficiently simulate IPS only assuming that the decidability of PIT for (commutative) arithmetic formulas by polynomial-size circuits is efficiently provable in Frege.

Common equivalence and size after forgetting

Common equivalence and size of forgetting from Horn formulae

One head is better than two: a polynomial restriction for propositional definite Horn forgetting

Reconstructing a single-head formula to facilitate logical forgetting

Dual Forgetting Operators in the Context of Weakest Sufficient and Strongest Necessary Conditions

A prime implicates-based formulae forgetting

Forgetting Formulas and Signature Elements in Epistemic States

Abductive forgetting

An Approach to Forgetting in Disjunctive Logic Programs that Preserves Strong Equivalence

On Forgetting in Tractable Propositional Fragments

Quantitatively Evaluating Formula-Variable Relevance by Forgetting.

Four algorithms for propositional forgetting

Boolean basis, formula size, and number of modal operators

On Forgetting Postulates in Answer Set Programming.

Transposition of variables is hard to describe

The Complexity of Variable Minimal Formulas

Concept Forgetting for ALCOI-Ontologies Using an Ackermann Approach

Forgetting complex propositions

Non-Commutative Formulas and Frege Lower Bounds: a New Characterization of Propositional Proofs.

On Concept Forgetting in Description Logics with Qualified Number Restrictions

Even shorter proofs without new variables