Abstract:This paper studies a fundamental problem regarding the security of blockchain PoW consensus on how the existence of multiple misbehaving miners influences the profitability of selfish mining. Each selfish miner maintains a private chain and makes it public opportunistically for acquiring more rewards incommensurate to his Hash power. We first establish a general Markov chain model to characterize the state transition of public and private chains for Basic Selfish Mining (BSM), and derive the stationary profitable threshold of Hash power in closed form. It reduces from 25% for a single attacker to below 21.48% for two symmetric attackers theoretically, and further reduces to around 10% with eight symmetric attackers experimentally. We next explore the profitable threshold when one of the attackers performs strategic mining based on Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) that only half of the attributes pertinent to a mining state are observable to him. An online algorithm is presented to compute the nearly optimal policy efficiently despite the large state space and high dimensional belief space. The profitable threshold is much lower for the strategic attacker. Last, we formulate a simple model of absolute mining revenue that yields an interesting observation: selfish mining is never profitable at the first difficulty adjustment period, but relies on the reimbursement of stationary selfish mining gains in future periods. The delay till being profitable of an attacker increases with the decrease of his Hash power, making blockchain miners more cautious about performing selfish mining.

Equilibrium of Blockchain Miners with Dynamic Asset Allocation

Survive and Thrive: A Stochastic Game for DDoS Attacks in Bitcoin Mining Pools

Stability analysis and control of decision-making of miners in blockchain

Games of Miners

From Griefing to Stability in Blockchain Mining Economies

A Cooperative Optimal Mining Model for Bitcoin

Does Miner Pooling Impact Bitcoin's Ability to Stay Decentralized?

Mining Pool Game Model and Nash Equilibrium Analysis for PoW-Based Blockchain Networks

Using Economic Risk to Model Miner Hash Rate Allocation in Cryptocurrencies

Greedy but Cautious: Conditions for Miner Convergence to Resource Allocation Equilibrium

Dynamic Selection of Mining Pool with Different Reward Sharing Strategy in Blockchain Networks

Discouraging Pool Block Withholding Attacks in Bitcoins

Economics of Blockchain Storage

A Deep Dive into Blockchain Selfish Mining

Blockchain Mining with Multiple Selfish Miners

Resource Allocation for Edge Computing-Based Blockchain: A Game Theoretic Approach.

Model-based Analysis of Mining Fairness in a Blockchain

Blockchain Mining Games

Insightful Mining Equilibria

Evolutionary Equilibrium Analysis for Decision on Block Size in Blockchain Systems

Is Monopolization Inevitable in Proof-of-Work Blockchains? Insights from Miner Scale Analysis