Comprehensive analysis of differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer (CRC).
Omid Solari,Tudor Constantin,Yuqian Jiang,Wengching Chan,Ilker Tunc,Preethi Srinivasan,Misagh Kordi,Marianne Santaguida,Breeana L. Mitchell,Alexey Aleshin,Ryan Swenerton,Joshua Babiarz,Trupti Kawli,Johannes G. Reiter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.3_suppl.73
IF: 45.3
2024-01-20
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:73 Background: Epigenetic alterations have been shown to govern many disease states, including cancer. A key epigenetic mark is the DNA methylation of CpGs. Large studies, like The Cancer Genome Atlas, have shown that DNA methylation can differentiate between cancer status and type. Here, differentially methylated genomic patterns were defined between patients with CRC and healthy individuals by utilizing patterns of co-methylation of adjacent CpG loci. Methods: Deep, whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) was conducted on DNA samples from 100 healthy individuals (median effective coverage of 352x±38x) and from 75 patients with CRC (median effective coverage of 48x±18x). The two cohorts were chosen to be balanced in terms of age (CRC: 58±11 years; healthy: 57±8 years) and to represent major ethnicities in the USA, and the CRC cohort was chosen to represent all stages, histologies and morphologies, and microsatellite instability (MSI, 23%). A novel machine learning model was developed to discover differentially methylated regions between the healthy and CRC cohorts as well as between subpopulations within the CRC cohort, including age, sex, stage, histology, and MSI vs microsatellite stability (MSS). Results: In total, we discovered 132,911 differentially methylated regions between healthy and CRC cohorts, spanning more than 1.14 million CpGs. 76% of all discovered regions were hypermethylated (70% CpG islands, 1.3% CpG shelves, 21% CpG shores) and the rest were hypomethylated (7.3% CpG islands, 8.6% CpG shelves, 25% CpG shores). We also discovered 220 hypermethylated regions that were differentially methylated between CRC MSI samples and CRC MSS samples and healthy cfDNA samples. Furthermore, we discovered subtype-specific differentially methylated regions, such as 62 hyper-methylated regions that were differentially methylated between mucinous adenocarcinoma samples and the rest of the cohort. Conclusions: Based on deep WGBS data from heterogeneous cohorts, representative of the US population eligible for CRC screening, we identified many differentially methylated regions as strong biomarker candidates for the early detection of cancer. Compared to recurrently mutated driver genes in CRC, we find that differential methylation profiles of CRC samples are generally much more homogenous and are therefore ideal biomarkers for targeted sequencing panels with the purpose of early cancer detection. Further, analysis of these patterns based on clinicopathologic factors enabled discovery of subtype specific markers, which can be incorporated to ensure equivalent performance for underrepresented subtypes or subpopulations.
oncology