Abstract:Three strictly comparable cross-section household dataset,related to 1988,1995 and 2001,are used to analyze the rapid yet unequal growth of wage and the sharp widening of wage structure.Earnings functions are compared and the increase in both the level and the inequality of wages are decomposed into their constituent elements.Distinctions are made between the variables likely to represent human capital,discrimination,and segmentation.The evidence suggests that productive characteristics were increasingly rewarded as marketization The Gini coefficient of earnings rose by 10.7 percentage points in the first phase from 1988 to 1995.Whereas the mean wage increased by 67 percent,the pay of the 10th percentile rose by only 22 percent,and that of the 90th percentile rose by 97 percent.These changes are much larger than those of the second phase from 1995 to 2001.Moreover,the returns to education rose sharply,as did the returns to occupation-specific skills.The initially slight inverse-U shape of the age-earnings profile became more pronounced: a change consistent with human capital theory.Thus the productive characteristics of workers were increasingly rewarded in the labor market.However,there were also signs of greater wage discrimination against women.Moreover,the market forces operating in the growing private sector and the relative immunity of the state sector from those forces generated greater wage segmentation among types of ownership,and provincial differences in the pace of reform and in economic growth created spatial segmentation in wages that could not be removed by the equilibrating movement of labor.Decomposition analyses were conducted in order to examine the contribution of particular characteristics to the rise in the Gini coefficient.Only a third of earnings inequality and its increase could be explained: the unobserved determinants are clearly important to the increase in earnings dispersion.The discrimination variables accounted for only a small part of the increase.The segmentation variables made the most important contribution,and that was mainly due to growing wage dispersion among provinces.This result is supported by other evidence of powerful divergence in mean earnings among provinces(Knight,Li and Zhao,2001).Some but not all components of human capital were disequalizing.These particular changes are likely to represent the stirring of labor market forces.

The Race between Technology and Woman: Changes in Gender and Skill Premia in OECD Countries

ICT Capital-Skill Complementarity and Wage Inequality: Evidence from OECD Countries

Marketization and Unequal Growth of Wage: Their Extent and Influence Factors

DIRECTED TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE: A KNOWLEDGE-BASED MODEL

Rising Wage Inequality:Composition Effect and Price Effect

Trade Liberalization,Biased Learning Effect and Wage Inequality in Developing Countries

Inequality and technological change

Unraveling wage inequality: tangible and intangible assets, globalization and labor market regulations

Overcoming gender bias in the digital economy. Empirical evidence for European countries

Skill-biased Technological Change and Wage Inequality in Developing Countries

Patent Protection, Technological Change and Wage Inequality

Investment-specific technological change, skill accumulation, and wage inequality

The skilled worker premium and labor's share of income: Recent trends in U.S. manufacturing

The gender gap in attitudes toward workplace technological change

International Factor Mobility, Monopolistic Competition, and Wage Inequality

Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Investment-Speci fi c Technological Change , Skill Accumulation , and Wage Inequality

Earnings Dynamics, Changing Job Skills, and STEM Careers*

Gap Widening or Closing? Research on the Gender Structure of R&D Personnel in the Context of Digital Economy

Examining the correlation of the level of wage inequality with labor market institutions

The new direction of technological change in the global economy

Understanding the Digitised Labour Market Through a Gendered Lens