Abstract:A basic underlying assumption in most of the research to date is that intermediate industry accounts of the economies in multiregional input-output (MRIO) tables exist and are accurate. In fact, if they exist at the subnational level, such accounts are, at best, roughly estimated and predicated on far less empirical information than is available for economies of nations. Moreover, intra- economy intermediate-industry flows are typically larger than the set of a region's commodity in- and out-flows. So, if intermediate industry flows in a set of MRIO accounts are noticeably mis-estimated, it follows that interregional trade coincidentally derived using them must be even more conspicuously in error. We hypothesize as more information is used to estimate MRIO accounts, the better the estimates should be. We start our experiment by consolidating 2019 FIGARO accounts of the 27 member states of the European Union, while maintaining sectoral detail, to produce a "national account". We then test several approaches to constructing MRIO tables. The approaches distribute interregional trade fully by receiving industry, as in FIGARO, as well as strictly in the form of a diagonalized matrix as if the commodity inflows are competitive imports. To do this, both a gravity model and RAS are applied to each approach. We then test to see how well the approaches estimate main features of FIGARO's MRIO accounts and detail a rather consistent ranking of the relative accuracy of them. We also find that the level of error inherent to the estimated MRIOs is markedly similar across approaches, particularly for multipliers. Further, relaxing interregional trade to a diagonalized matrix tends to add very little error. The approach that uses the least data is, however, markedly worse in replicating countries' direct requirements matrices and Leontief inverses, which suggests its use in a more-limited set of applications.

Identifying Key Sectors in the Regional Economy: A Network Analysis Approach Using Input-Output Data

Using network science to quantify economic disruptions in regional input-output networks

Vertex Centralities in Input-Output Networks Reveal the Structure of Modern Economies

Mapping analytical methods between input–output economics and network science

Input-output networks offering new insights of economic structure

Reconstruction of Demand Shocks in Input-Output Networks

Central Industries in the Ecuadorian Input–Output Network. An Application of Social Network Analysis

Upstreamness and downstreamness in input-output analysis from local and aggregate information

A New Method for Interindustry Linkage Analysis Based on Demand-Driven and Multisector Input-Output Model and Its Application in China's Manufacturing and Producer Services

Estimating high-resolution interregional input–output tables: a Bayesian spatial approach

Regional and Sectoral Structures and Their Dynamics of Chinese Economy: A Network Perspective from Multi-Regional Input-Output Tables

Reconstructing firm-level input-output networks from partial information

Scaling of global input–output networks

Revisiting Methods for Estimating Interregional Input-Output Accounts: It's Not Just About Trade Flows

Netconomics: Novel Forecasting Techniques from the Combination of Big Data, Network Science and Economics

Spatializing Social Networking Analysis to Capture Local Innovation Flows towards Inclusive Transition

Regional economic integration via detection of circular flow in international value-added network

Research on the Statistical Properties and Stability of Complex Interindustrial Networks

Measuring Global Value Chains and Regional Economic Integration: an International Input-Output Approach

Estimating systemic importance with missing data in input-output graphs

A New Approach to Building the Interindustry Input--Output Table