Abstract:Speculative execution attacks exploiting speculative execution to leak secrets have aroused significant concerns in both industry and academia. They mainly exploit covert or side channels over microarchitectural states left by mis-speculated and squashed instructions (i.e., transient instructions). Most such attacks target cache states. Existing cache-based defenses against speculative execution attacks fall into two categories, Invisible and Undo. Most Invisible defenses buffer execution metadata of speculative instructions and place them into the cache only if the speculatively executed instructions become determined. Motivated by the fact that mis-speculations are rare cases, Undo defenses allow speculative instructions to modify cache states. Upon a mis-speculation, they rollback cache states to the ones prior to the execution of transient instructions. However, Invisible defenses have been recently found insecure by the speculative interference attack. This calls for a deep security inspection of Undo defenses against speculative execution attacks. In this paper, we present unXpec as the first attack against Undo-based safe speculation. It exploits the secret-dependent timing channel exhibited through the rollback operations of Undo defenses. Specifically, the rollback process requires both invalidating cache lines brought into the cache by transient instructions and restoring evicted cache lines from the cache by transiently loaded data. This opens up a channel that encodes secret via the timing difference between when rollback involves much invalidation and restoration or not. We further leverage eviction sets to enforce more restoration operations. This yields a longer rollback time and thus a larger secret-dependent timing difference. We demonstrate the timing channel over the open-source CleanupSpec, a representative Undo solution. A single transient load can trigger a secret-dependent timing difference of 22 cycles (without eviction sets) of 32 cycles (with eviction sets), which is sufficiently exploitable for constructing a covert channel for speculative execution attacks. We run unXpec on the gem5 simulator with CleanupSpec enabled. The results show that unXpec can leak secrets at a high rate of 140 Kbps with an accuracy over 90%. Simply enforcing constant-time rollback to mitigate unXpec may induce an over 70% performance overhead.

Automatically Eliminating Speculative Leaks from Cryptographic Code with Blade

DECLASSIFLOW: A Static Analysis for Modeling Non-Speculative Knowledge to Relax Speculative Execution Security Measures (Full Version)

unXpec: Breaking Undo-based Safe Speculation

Rosita++: Automatic Higher-Order Leakage Elimination from Cryptographic Code

Breaking Bad: How Compilers Break Constant-Time~Implementations

Libra: Architectural Support For Principled, Secure And Efficient Balanced Execution On High-End Processors (Extended Version)

Preventing Your Faults From Telling Your Secrets: Defenses Against Pigeonhole Attacks

Binsec/Rel: Symbolic Binary Analyzer for Security with Applications to Constant-Time and Secret-Erasure

MicroWalk: A Framework for Finding Side Channels in Binaries

Mitigating Power Side Channels during Compilation

Secure Speculation Via Speculative Secret Flow Tracking.

Do You Even Lift? Strengthening Compiler Security Guarantees Against Spectre Attacks

SNIP: Speculative Execution and Non-Interference Preservation for Compiler Transformations

Securing Optimized Code Against Power Side Channels

Protecting Distributed Primitives Against Leakage: Equivocal Secret Sharing and more

Automatic and Incremental Repair for Speculative Information Leaks

SPOILER: Speculative Load Hazards Boost Rowhammer and Cache Attacks

SpectreRewind: Leaking Secrets to Past Instructions

Beyond Over-Protection: A Targeted Approach to Spectre Mitigation and Performance Optimization

Eliminating Timing Side-Channel Leaks using Program Repair

Exploiting Intermediate Value Leakage in Dilithium: A Template-Based Approach