Abstract:Spin orbit torques are of great interest for switching the magnetization direction in nanostructures, moving skyrmions and exciting spin waves. The standard method of determining their efficiency is by spin torque ferromagnetic resonance (ST-FMR), a technique that involves analyzing the resonance linewidth or lineshape. On microstuctures these two analysis methods are quite consistent. Here we present ST-FMR results on permalloy (Ni$_{80}$Fe$_{20}$) nanowires -- with widths varying from $150$ to 800 nm -- that show that the standard model used to analyze the resonance linewidth and lineshape give different results; the efficiency appears greatly enhanced in nanowires when the lineshape method is used. A ST-FMR model that properly accounts for the sample shape is presented and shows much better consistency between the two methods. Micromagnetic simulations are used to verify the model. These results and the more accurate nanowire model presented are of importance for characterizing and optimizing charge-to-spin conversion efficiencies in nanostructures.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to solve the problem of inconsistency in measuring the charge - to - spin conversion efficiency using Spin - Orbit Torque (SOT) in nanowires. Specifically, the authors found that when using the traditional Spin Torque Ferromagnetic Resonance (ST - FMR) model to analyze the resonance linewidth and spectral line shape of nanowires, there are significant differences in the results. This difference does not exist in microstructures but is particularly obvious in nanowires. #### Main problems: 1. **Limitations of the traditional model**: The traditional ST - FMR model assumes that the sample has an easy - plane magnetic anisotropy, which is reasonable in microstructures but ignores the influence of the sample shape on magnetic anisotropy in nanowires. 2. **Result differences of different analysis methods**: The charge - to - spin conversion efficiency measured by the spectral line shape (lineshape) analysis method is significantly enhanced in nanowires, while the result measured by the linewidth (linewidth) analysis method is relatively low. 3. **Imperfection of the physical mechanism**: The traditional model fails to fully consider the influence of the geometric shape of nanowires on their magnetic properties, resulting in the above differences. To solve these problems, the authors proposed a new nanowire model, which can better explain and unify the results of these two analysis methods. In addition, the authors also verified the effectiveness of the new model through micromagnetic simulations. ### Key improvements of the new model: - **Considering the magnetic anisotropy of the sample shape**: The in - plane uniaxial anisotropy field $ B_A $ is introduced to describe the contribution of the nanowire shape to the magnetic properties. - **Correcting the calculation of the Oersted field**: Considering the edge effect of nanowires, the average value calculation of the Oersted field is corrected. - **Re - evaluating the precession axis angle**: The angle $ \phi $ between the precession axis and the current is corrected through numerical calculation. These improvements enable the new model to provide consistent and accurate charge - to - spin conversion efficiency measurement results in a wider range of nanowire widths. ### Conclusion: By introducing a new model that takes into account the shape of nanowires, the authors successfully solved the problem of inconsistency when the traditional ST - FMR model is applied to nanowires, providing a reliable tool for future research and optimization of the charge - to - spin conversion efficiency in nanostructures.

Charge-to-spin conversion efficiency in ferromagnetic nanowires by spin torque ferromagnetic resonance: Reconciling lineshape and linewidth analysis methods

Quantifying Spin-Torque Efficiency and Magnetoresistance Coefficient by Microwave Photoresistance in Spin-Torque Ferromagnetic Resonance

High Frequency Magnetization Rotation Induced By A Dc Spin-Polarized Current In Magnetic Nanostructures

Micromagnetic insights on in-plane magnetization rotation and propagation of magnetization waves in nanowires

Transverse and Longitudinal Spin-Torque Ferromagnetic Resonance for Improved Measurements of Spin-Orbit Torques

Spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance based on current-induced impedance

Anatomy of Electrical Signals and Dc-Voltage Line Shape in Spin-Torque Ferromagnetic Resonance

Spin-current Effect on Ferromagnetic Resonance in Patterned Magnetic Thin Film Structures

Anatomy of electrical signals and dc-voltage lineshape in spin torque ferromagnetic resonance

Influence of Exchange Bias on Spin Torque Ferromagnetic Resonance for Quantification of Spin-orbit Torque Efficiency

Influence of the spin pumping induced inverse spin Hall effect on spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance measurements

Revisiting the Analytical Solution of Spin-Orbit Torque Switched Nanoscale Perpendicular Ferromagnet

FMR-related phenomena in spintronic devices

Micromagnetic Modeling of Magnetization Dynamics Driven by Spin-Transfer Torque in Magnetic Nanostructures

Spin-Torque Ferromagnetic Resonance Measurements Utilizing Spin Hall Magnetoresistance in W/Co40fe40b20/Mgo Structures

Spin-Torque Ferromagnetic Resonance in W/Co−Fe−B/W/Co−Fe−B/MgO Stacks

Resonant Measurement of Non-Reorientable Spin-Orbit Torque from a Ferromagnetic Source Layer Accounting for Dynamic Spin Pumping

Spin-torque–driven antiferromagnetic resonance

Local spin transfer torque and magnetoresistance in domain walls with variable width

Mode Structures and Damping of Quantized Spin Waves in Ferromagnetic Nanowires*

Quantification of Hybrid Topological Spin Textures and Their Nanoscale Fluctuations in Ferrimagnets.