Egalitarian pooling and sharing of longevity risk a.k.a. Can an administrator help skin the tontine cat?
Jan Dhaene,Moshe A. Milevsky
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.09.003
2024-10-03
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
Abstract:This paper is concerned with the "problem" of allocating tontine fund winnings in a pool where participants differ in wealth (contributions) and health (longevity), and particularly when the pools are relatively small in size. In other words, we offer a modelling framework for distributing longevity-risk pools' income and benefits (or tontine winnings) when participants are heterogeneous. Similar to the nascent literature on decentralized risk sharing (DRS), there are several equally plausible arrangements for sharing benefits (a.k.a. "skinning the cat") among survivors. Indeed, the selected rule may depend on the extent of social cohesion within the longevity risk pool, ranging from solidarity and altruism to pure individualism. And, if fairness is a concern, we suggest introducing an administrator – which differs from a guarantor – to make the tontine pool payouts collectively actuarial fair in the sense that the group of participants will on average receive the same benefits as what they collectively invested, and we provide the mathematical framework to implement that suggestion. One thing is for certain: actuarial science cannot really offer uniqueness; it is only a methodology.
economics,social sciences, mathematical methods,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,statistics & probability