Abstract:All results of the neutron lifetime measurements performed in the last 20 years with the UCN storage method are in a good agreement. These results are consistent with the latest most accurate measurements of the neutron decay asymmetry within the Standard Model. However, there is a significant discrepancy at $3.6\sigma$ (1% of the decay probability) level between the averaged result of the storage method experiments and the most accurate measurements performed with the beam method. This article addresses the possible causes of such discrepancy. We focused on finding the spectrum of possible systematic corrections in the beam experiment. Four separate sources of the systematic errors which had not been properly addressed in articles dedicated to the beam technique were considered. Two of those sources are related with the motion of protons in an electromagnetic field and the elastic scattering by the residual gas. The third error concerns proton loss in the dead layer of the detector. It is shown the corresponding correction requires a more detailed analysis than that given in the papers describing the beam measurement method. The fourth source of the systematic error is the charge exchange process on the residual gas. The influence of that process was neglected in the beam method experiments. We present arguments that careful analysis of this issue is necessary since the proposed proton losses correction decreases the measured lifetime. For the problem of proton charge exchange on a residual gas, the spectrum of possible corrections is investigated. It is shown that for an accurate calculation of the correction, it is necessary to directly measure the concentration and composition of the residual gas inside the proton trap. The analysis reveals that even presence of only $H_2$ molecules can lead to the significant correction which is the most probable explanation of the neutron anomaly.

A Comment on "The possible explanation of neutron lifetime beam anomaly" by A. P. Serebrov, et al

Search for explanation of the neutron lifetime anomaly

An experimental search for an explanation of the difference between beam and bottle neutron lifetime measurements

Comment on: "The interaction of neutrons with 7Be at BBN temperatures: Lack of Standard Nuclear Solution to the Primordial 7Li Problem" by M. Gai et al

An exciting hint towards the solution of the neutron lifetime puzzle?

Reply to the Comment "Past of a quantum particle and weak measurement"

Comment on "Final CONUS results on coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering at the Brokdorf reactor"

Comment on: "Investigating the time dependence of neutron-proton equilibration using molecular dynamics simulations" by A.Jedele et al: Phys Rev C 107, 024601 (2023)

Reply to the Comment on "Evidence for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay" [Mod. Phys. Lett. A 16(2001)2409]

Exciting hint toward the solution of the neutron lifetime puzzle

Reply to the Comment by Fujikawa and Shrock on the Observability of the Neutrino Charge Radius

Neutron lifetime anomaly and mirror matter theory

Reply to "Comment on 'Comparison of potential models with the pp-scattering data below 350 MeV.' "

A Method for Proton Detector Efficiency Measurement with Applications in Neutron Beta Decay and Lifetime Experiments

Unexplained Excess of Electron-Like Events from a 1-Gev Neutrino Beam

Determination of the Free Neutron Lifetime

New Physics at Neutron Beam Dump

A new neutron lifetime experiment with cold neutron beam decay in superfluid helium-4

Publisher’s Note: Measurement of the Ratio of Theνμcharged-Current Single-Pion Production to Quasielastic Scattering with a 0.8 GeV Neutrino Beam on Mineral Oil [phys. Rev. Lett.103, 081801 (2009)]

A novel technique of extracting UCN lifetimes from storage bottle measurements dominated by scattering losses

Wexleret Al.reply: