Abstract:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain atrophy occurs in the late stage of dementia, yet structural MRI is widely used in the work-up. Atrophy patterns can suggest a diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD) or frontotemporal dementia (FTD) but are difficult to assess visually. We hypothesized that the availability of a quantitative volumetric brain MRI report would increase neuroradiologists' accuracy in diagnosing AD, FTD, or healthy controls compared with visual assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with AD, 17 with FTD, and 21 cognitively healthy patients were identified from the electronic health systems record and a behavioral neurology clinic. Four neuroradiologists evaluated T1-weighted anatomic MRI studies with and without a volumetric report. Outcome measures were the proportion of correct diagnoses of neurodegenerative disease versus normal aging ("rough accuracy") and AD versus FTD ("exact accuracy"). Generalized linear mixed models were fit to assess whether the use of a volumetric report was associated with higher accuracy, accounting for random effects of within-rater and within-subject variability. Post hoc within-group analysis was performed with multiple comparisons correction. Residualized volumes were tested for an association with the diagnosis using ANOVA. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant effect of the report on overall correct diagnoses. The proportion of "exact" correct diagnoses was higher with the report versus without the report for AD (0.52 versus 0.38) and FTD (0.49 versus 0.32) and lower for cognitively healthy (0.75 versus 0.89). The proportion of "rough" correct diagnoses of neurodegenerative disease was higher with the report than without the report within the AD group (0.59 versus 0.41), and it was similar within the FTD group (0.66 versus 0.63). Post hoc within-group analysis suggested that the report increased the accuracy in AD (OR = 2.77) and decreased the accuracy in cognitively healthy (OR = 0.25). Residualized hippocampal volumes were smaller in AD (mean difference –1.8; multiple comparisons correction, –2.8 to –0.8; P < .001) and FTD (mean difference –1.2; multiple comparisons correction, –2.2 to –0.1; P = .02) compared with cognitively healthy. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of a brain volumetric report did not improve neuroradiologists' accuracy over visual assessment in diagnosing AD or FTD in this limited sample. Post hoc analysis suggested that the report may have biased readers incorrectly toward a diagnosis of neurodegeneration in cognitively healthy adults.

Accuracy of MRI Classification Algorithms in a Tertiary Memory Center Clinical Routine Cohort

Automated quantitative MRI volumetry reports support diagnostic interpretation in dementia: a multi-rater, clinical accuracy study

Automated Volumetric Software in Dementia: Help or Hindrance to the Neuroradiologist?

Association between fully automated MRI-based volumetry of different brain regions and neuropsychological test performance in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

Development of a computer-aided diagnostic system for Alzheimer's disease using magnetic resonance imaging

Comparing two artificial intelligence software packages for normative brain volumetry in memory clinic imaging

Clinical applicability of quantitative atrophy measures on MRI in patients suspected of Alzheimer’s disease

Regional MRI volumetry using NeuroQuant versus visual rating scales in patients with cognitive impairment and dementia

Combined cognitive assessment and automated MRI volumetry improves the diagnostic accuracy of detecting MCI due to Alzheimer's disease

Inter- and Intra-Scanner Variability of Automated Brain Volumetry on Three Magnetic Resonance Imaging Systems in Alzheimer's Disease and Controls

An Automated Algorithm for the Computation of Brain Volume Change from Sequential MRIs Using an Iterative Principal Component Analysis and Its Evaluation for the Assessment of Whole-Brain Atrophy Rates in Patients with Probable Alzheimer's Disease.

Classification of MRI and Psychological Testing Data Based on Support Vector Machine.

Clinically feasible automated MRI volumetry of the brain as a prognostic marker in subjective and mild cognitive impairment

Automated brain volumetric program measuring regional brain atrophy in diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease dementia

Longitudinal automated brain volumetry vs. expert visual assessment of atrophy progression on MRI is robust but caution is advised

Automated Brain MRI Volumetry Differentiates Early Stages of Alzheimer’s Disease From Normal Aging

Volumetric MRI vs clinical predictors of Alzheimer disease in mild cognitive impairment

Diagnostic utility of brain MRI volumetry in comparing traumatic brain injury, Alzheimer disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

Automatic classification of cognitively normal, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease using structural MRI analysis

Machine Learning for Diagnosis of AD and Prediction of MCI Progression From Brain MRI Using Brain Anatomical Analysis Using Diffeomorphic Deformation

Jointly Using Computationally Selected And Clinically Suggested Cortical Volumes For Automated Identification Of Mild Cognitive Impairment