Controllability Analysis of Functional Brain Networks

Shikuang Deng,Shi Gu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.08278
2020-03-18
Abstract:Network control theory has recently emerged as a promising approach for understanding brain function and dynamics. By operationalizing notions of control theory for brain networks, it offers a fundamental explanation for how brain dynamics may be regulated by structural connectivity. While powerful, the approach does not currently consider other non-structural explanations of brain dynamics. Here we extend the analysis of network controllability by formalizing the evolution of neural signals as a function of effective inter-regional coupling and pairwise signal covariance. We find that functional controllability characterizes a region's impact on the capacity for the whole system to shift between states, and significantly predicts individual difference in performance on cognitively demanding tasks including those task working memory, language, and emotional intelligence. When comparing measurements from functional and structural controllability, we observed consistent relations between average and modal controllability, supporting prior work. In the same comparison, we also observed distinct relations between controllability and synchronizability, reflecting the additional information obtained from functional signals. Our work suggests that network control theory can serve as a systematic analysis tool to understand the energetics of brain state transitions, associated cognitive processes, and subsequent behaviors.
Quantitative Methods,Neurons and Cognition
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to better understand the dynamic of brain functions by combining system identification and network control theory. Specifically, the paper focuses on how to characterize and predict the ability of brain state transitions through functional connectivity (i.e., the effective connections between brain regions), and the relationship between this ability and an individual's performance in cognitive tasks. In addition, the paper also explores the relationship between functional controllability and structural controllability, aiming to reveal the roles of different brain regions and the changes in their energy consumption when the brain transitions between the resting state and the task - performing state. The main contributions of the paper are as follows: 1. **Proposing a new analytical framework**: Combining functional neuroimaging data and system identification methods, a linear control model is constructed to estimate the effective connectivity and noise covariance of the brain, thereby defining and measuring functional controllability. 2. **The role of functional controllability**: The study found that functional controllability can significantly predict individual differences in performance in high - cognitive - demand tasks (such as working memory, language, and emotional intelligence tasks), indicating that functional controllability is not only an important indicator of brain state transitions but also a potential marker of cognitive ability. 3. **Comparison between functional and structural controllability**: By comparing functional controllability and structural controllability, the paper found the consistencies and differences between the two, further supporting the importance of the additional information provided by functional signals for understanding brain dynamics. 4. **The influence of task state on controllability**: The study shows that from the resting state to the task state, the average controllability decreases while the modal controllability increases, which reflects the way the brain adjusts its activation patterns and energy consumption in different states in order to adapt to performing specific tasks. Through these analyses, the paper not only deepens our understanding of how the brain achieves state transitions by regulating the connections between different brain regions but also provides a new perspective to explain individual differences in performance in cognitive tasks. This research is of great significance for understanding the functional organization of the brain, cognitive processes, and the mechanisms behind them.