Breast Cancer Index and Prediction of Extended Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy Benefit in Hormone Receptor-positive Breast Cancer from the NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42 Trial

Eleftherios P. Mamounas,Hanna Bandos,Priya Rastogi,Yi Zhang,Kai Treuner,Peter C. Lucas,Charles E. Geyer,Louis Fehrenbacher,Stephen K. Chia,Adam M. Brufsky,Janice M. Walshe,Gamini S. Soori,Shaker Dakhil,Soonmyung Paik,Sandra M. Swain,Dennis C. Sgroi,Catherine A. Schnabel,Norman Wolmark
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1977
IF: 13.801
2024-02-22
Clinical Cancer Research
Abstract:Purpose: BCI (H/I) has been shown to predict extended endocrine therapy (EET) benefit. We examined BCI (H/I) for EET benefit prediction in NSABP B-42, which evaluated extended letrozole therapy (ELT) in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients after 5 years of ET. Methods: Stratified Cox model was used to analyze RFI as primary endpoint, with DR, BCFI, and DFS, as secondary endpoints. Due to a non-proportional effect of ELT on DR, time-dependent analyses were performed. Results: The translational cohort included 2,178 patients (45% BCI (H/I)-High, 55% BCI (H/I)-Low). ELT showed an absolute 10-year RFI benefit of 1.6% (P=0.10), resulting in an underpowered primary analysis (50% power). ELT benefit and BCI (H/I) did not show a significant interaction for RFI (BCI [(H/I])-Low: 10y absolute benefit 1.1% [HR=0.70, 0.43-1.12, P=0.13]; BCI [(H/I])-High: 2.4% [HR=0.83, 0.55-1.26, p=0.38]; Pinteraction=0.56). Time-dependent DR analysis showed that after 4y, BCI (H/I)-High patients had significant ELT benefit (HR=0.29, 0.12-0.69, P<0.01), whereas BCI (H/I)-Low patients were less likely to benefit (HR=0.68, 0.33-1.39, P=0.29) (Pinteraction=0.14). Prediction of ELT benefit by BCI (H/I) was more apparent in the HER2- subset after 4y (ELT-by-BCI (H/I) Pinteraction=0.04). Conclusions: BCI(H/I)-High vs -Low did not show a statistically significant difference in ELT benefit for the primary endpoint (RFI). However, in time-dependent DR analysis, BCI (H/I)-High patients experienced statistically significant benefit from ELT after 4y, whereas (H/I)-Low patients did not. Because BCI (H/I) has been validated as a predictive marker of EET benefit in other trials, additional follow-up may enable further characterization of BCI's predictive ability.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?