Deceptively cold dust in the massive starburst galaxy GN20 at $z\sim4$

Isabella Cortzen,Georgios E. Magdis,Francesco Valentino,Emanuele Daddi,Daizhong Liu,Dimitra Rigopoulou,Mark Sargent,Dominik Riechers,Diane Cormier,Jacqueline A. Hodge,Fabian Walter,David Elbaz,Matthieu Béthermin,Thomas R. Greve,Vasily Kokorev,Sune Toft
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937217
2020-02-08
Abstract:We present new observations, carried out with IRAM NOEMA, of the atomic neutral carbon transitions [CI](1-0) at 492 GHz and [CI](2-1) at 809 GHz of GN20, a well-studied star-bursting galaxy at $z=4.05$. The high luminosity line ratio [CI](2-1)/[CI](1-0) implies an excitation temperature of $48^{+14}_{-9}$ K, which is significantly higher than the apparent dust temperature of $T_{\rm d}=33\pm2$ K ($\beta=1.9$) derived under the common assumption of an optically thin far-infrared dust emission, but fully consistent with $T_{\rm d}=52\pm5$ K of a general opacity model where the optical depth ($\tau$) reaches unity at a wavelength of $\lambda_0=170\pm23$ $\mu$m. Moreover, the general opacity solution returns a factor of $\sim 2\times$ lower dust mass and, hence, a lower molecular gas mass for a fixed gas-to-dust ratio, than with the optically thin dust model. The derived properties of GN20 thus provide an appealing solution to the puzzling discovery of starbursts appearing colder than main-sequence galaxies above $z>2.5$, in addition to a lower dust-to-stellar mass ratio that approaches the physical value predicted for starburst galaxies.
Astrophysics of Galaxies
What problem does this paper attempt to address?