Refining Constructive Hybrid Games

Rose Bohrer,André Platzer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.14

2020-02-14

Abstract:We extend the constructive differential game logic (CdGL) of hybrid games with a refinement connective that relates two hybrid games. We use this connective to prove a folk theorem relating hybrid games to hybrid systems.

Logic in Computer Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Differential Hybrid Games

André Platzer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3091123

2017-02-24

Abstract:This article introduces differential hybrid games, which combine differential games with hybrid games. In both kinds of games, two players interact with continuous dynamics. The difference is that hybrid games also provide all the features of hybrid systems and discrete games, but only deterministic differential equations. Differential games, instead, provide differential equations with continuous-time game input by both players, but not the luxury of hybrid games, such as mode switches and discrete-time or alternating adversarial interaction. This article augments differential game logic with modalities for the combined dynamics of differential hybrid games. It shows how hybrid games subsume differential games and introduces differential game invariants and differential game variants for proving properties of differential games inductively.

Logic in Computer Science,Computer Science and Game Theory,Programming Languages,Dynamical Systems,Logic
Hybrid-Dynamic Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse Games

Guillermo Badia,Daniel Gaina,Alexander Knapp,Tomasz Kowalski,Martin Wirsing

2024-12-11

Abstract:Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse games provide means to characterize elementary equivalence for first-order logic, and by standard translation also for modal logics. We propose a novel generalization of Ehrenfeucht- Fraisse games to hybrid-dynamic logics which is direct and fully modular: parameterized by the features of the hybrid language we wish to include, for instance, the modal and hybrid language operators as well as first-order existential quantification. We use these games to establish a new modular Fraisse-Hintikka Theorem for hybrid-dynamic propositional logic and its various fragments. We study the relationship between countable game equivalence (determined by countable Ehrenfeucht- Fraisse games) and bisimulation (determined by countable back-and-forth systems). In general, the former turns out to be weaker than the latter, but under certain conditions on the language, the two coincide. We also use games to prove that for reachable image-finite Kripke structures elementary equivalence implies isomorphism.

Logic in Computer Science
Modelling Simultaneous Games in Dynamic Logic

Johan van Benthem,Sujata Ghosh,Fenrong Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9390-y

IF: 1.595

2008-01-01

Synthese

Abstract:We make a proposal for formalizing simultaneous games at the abstraction level of player’s powers, combining ideas from dynamic logic of sequential games and concurrent dynamic logic. We prove completeness for a new system of ‘concurrent game logic’ CDGL with respect to finite non-determined games. We also show how this system raises new mathematical issues, and throws light on branching quantifiers and independence-friendly evaluation games for first-order logic.
Deciding the synthesis problem for hybrid games through bisimulation

Catalin Dima,Mariem Hammami,Youssouf Oualhadj,Régine Laleau

2024-09-30

Abstract:Hybrid games are games played on a finite graph endowed with real variables which may model behaviors of discrete controllers of continuous systems. The synthesis problem for hybrid games is decidable for classical objectives (like LTL formulas) when the games are initialized singular, meaning that the slopes of the continuous variables are piecewise constant and variables are reset whenever their slope changes. The known proof adapts the region construction from timed games. In this paper we show that initialized singular games can be reduced, via a sequence of alternating bisimulations, to timed games, generalizing the known reductions by bisimulation from initialized singular automata to timed automata. Alternating bisimulation is the generalization of bisimulation to games, accomodating a strategy translation lemma by which, when two games are bisimilar and carry the same observations, each strategy in one of the games can be translated to a strategy in the second game such that all the outcomes of the second strategy satisfies the same property that are satisfied by the first strategy. The advantage of the proposed approach is that one may then use realizability tools for timed games to synthesize a winning strategy for a given objective, and then use the strategy translation lemma to obtain a winning strategy in the hybrid game for the same objective.

Logic in Computer Science,Formal Languages and Automata Theory
Synchronous Games, Simulations and lambda-calculus

Pierre Hyvernat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0905.4066

2009-05-26

Abstract:We refine a model for linear logic based on two well-known ingredients: games and simulations. We have already shown that usual simulation relations form a sound notion of morphism between games; and that we can interpret all linear logic in this way. One particularly interesting point is that we interpret multiplicative connectives by synchronous operations on games. We refine this work by giving computational contents to our simulation relations. To achieve that, we need to restrict to intuitionistic linear logic. This allows to work in a constructive setting, thus keeping a computational content to the proofs. We then extend it by showing how to interpret some of the additional structure of the exponentials. To be more precise, we first give a denotational model for the typed lambda-calculus; and then give a denotational model for the differential lambda-calculus of Ehrhard and Regnier. Both this models are proved correct constructively.

Logic in Computer Science,Logic
Game Solution, Epistemic Dynamics and Fixed-Point Logics

Johan van Benthem,Amelie Gheerbrant

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/fi-2010-261

2010-01-01

Fundamenta Informaticae

Abstract:Current methods for solving games embody a form of "procedural rationality" that invites logical analysis in its own right. This paper is a brief case study of Backward Induction for extensive games, replacing earlier static logical definitions by stepwise dynamic ones. We consider a number of analysis from recent years that look different conceptually, and find that they are all mathematically equivalent. This shows how an abstract logical perspective can bring out basic invariant structure in games. We then generalize this to an exploration of fixed-point logics on finite trees that best fit game-theoretic equilibria. We end with some open questions that suggest a broader program for merging current computational logics with notions and results from game theory. This paper is largely a program for opening up an area: an extended version of the technical results will be found in the forthcoming dissertation [26].
A Game Perspective of Refinement of Component Models

Zizhen Wang,Hanpin Wang,Yongzhi Cao,Wanling Qu,Wei Jin,Meixia Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/compsac.2010.52

2010-01-01

Abstract:Previous works on formal development for component-based systems usually equate refinement relations as behaviors containment. This setting facilitates verifying safety properties, but can't capture the intuition that a refined component should more easily react to the environment and is not convenient from a point view of design. To address this issue, we argue in favor of defining refinement of component models in terms of alternating simulation, which is a relation on game models with a game-theoretical interpretation. We investigate the refinement relations of component models in the framework of rCOS, which is a formal development method for component systems. We propose the refinement relations of rCOS contract models and specification models respectively and further prove they are alternating simulations. Finally, we define the composition operator on specifications and show the alternating refinement is compositional with respect to this operator.
Two-Player Zero-Sum Hybrid Games

Santiago J. Leudo,Ricardo G. Sanfelice

2024-07-25

Abstract:In this paper, we formulate a two-player zero-sum game under dynamic constraints defined by hybrid dynamical equations. The game consists of a min-max problem involving a cost functional that depends on the actions and resulting solutions to the hybrid system, defined as functions of hybrid time and, hence, can flow or jump. A terminal set conviniently defined allows to recast both finite and infinite horizon problems. We present sufficient conditions given in terms of Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman-Isaacs-like equations to guarantee to attain a solution to the game. It is shown that when the players select the optimal strategy, the value function can be evaluated without computing solutions to the hybrid system. Under additional conditions, we show that the optimal state-feedback laws render a set of interest asymptotically stable for the resulting hybrid closed-loop system. Applications of this problem, as presented here, include a disturbance rejection scenario for which the effect of the perturbation is upper bounded, and a security scenario in which we formulate an optimal control problem under the presence of a maximizing attack.

Optimization and Control,Systems and Control
Constructive comparison in bidding combinatorial games

Prem Kant,Urban Larsson,Ravi K. Rai,Akshay V. Upasany

2023-10-30

Abstract:A class of discrete Bidding Combinatorial Games that generalize alternating normal play was introduced by Kant, Larsson, Rai, and Upasany (2022). The major questions concerning optimal outcomes were resolved. By generalizing standard game comparison techniques from alternating normal play, we propose an algorithmic play-solution to the problem of game comparison for bidding games. We demonstrate some consequences of this result that generalize classical results in alternating play (from Winning Ways 1982 and On Numbers and Games 1976). In particular, integers, dyadics and numbers have many nice properties, such as group structures, but on the other hand the game * is non-invertible. We state a couple of thrilling conjectures and open problems for readers to dive into this promising path of bidding combinatorial games.

Computer Science and Game Theory,Combinatorics
Diegetic Representation of Feedback in Open Games

Matteo Capucci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.380.9

2023-07-31

Abstract:We improve the framework of open games with agency by showing how the players' counterfactual analysis giving rise to Nash equilibria can be described in the dynamics of the game itself (hence diegetically), getting rid of devices such as equilibrium predicates. This new approach overlaps almost completely with the way gradient-based learners are specified and trained. Indeed, we show feedback propagation in games can be seen as a form of backpropagation, with a crucial difference explaining the distinctive character of the phenomenology of non-cooperative games. We outline a functorial construction of arena of games, show players form a subsystem over it, and prove that their 'fixpoint behaviours' are Nash equilibria.

Computer Science and Game Theory,Multiagent Systems,Category Theory
Complete Dynamic Logic of Communicating Hybrid Programs

Marvin Brieger,Stefan Mitsch,André Platzer

2024-08-09

Abstract:This article presents a relatively complete proof calculus for the dynamic logic of communicating hybrid programs dLCHP. Beyond traditional hybrid systems mixing discrete and continuous dynamics, communicating hybrid programs feature parallel interactions of hybrid systems. This not only compounds the subtleties of hybrid and parallel systems but adds the truly simultaneous synchronized evolution of parallel hybrid dynamics as a new challenge. To enable compositional reasoning about communicating hybrid programs nevertheless, dLCHP combines differential dynamic logic dL and assumption-commitment reasoning. To maintain the logical essence of dynamic logic axiomatizations, dLCHP's proof calculus presents a new modal logic view onto ac-reasoning. This modal view drives a decomposition of classical monolithic proof rules for parallel systems reasoning into new modular axioms, which yields better flexibility and simplifies soundness arguments. Adequacy of the proof calculus is shown by two completeness results: First, dLCHP is complete relative to the logic of communication traces and differential equation properties. This result proves the new modular modal view sufficient for reasoning about parallel hybrid systems, and captures modular strategies for reasoning about concrete parallel hybrid systems. The second result proof-theoretically aligns dLCHP and dL by proving that reasoning about parallel hybrid systems is exactly as hard as reasoning about hybrid systems, continuous systems, or discrete systems. This completeness result reveals the possibility of representational succinctness in parallel hybrid systems proofs.

Logic in Computer Science
Affine Normal Play

Urban Larsson,Richard J. Nowakowski,Carlos P. Santos

2024-02-08

Abstract:There are many combinatorial games in which a move can terminate the game, such as a checkmate in chess. These moves give rise to diverse situations that fall outside the scope of the classical normal play structure. To analyze these games, an algebraic extension is necessary, including infinities as elements. In this work, affine normal play, the algebraic structure resulting from that extension, is analyzed. We prove that it is possible to compare two affine games using only their forms. Furthermore, affine games can still be reduced, although the reduced forms are not unique. We establish that the classical normal play is order-embedded in the extended structure, constituting its substructure of invertible elements. Additionally, as in classical theory, affine games born by day n form a lattice with respect to the partial order of games.

Combinatorics
Erratum: "rational dynamics and epistemic logic in games"

JOHAN VAN BENTHEM

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219198907001485

2007-01-01

International Game Theory Review

Abstract:Game-theoretic solution concepts describe sets of strategy profiles that are optimal for all players in some plausible sense. Such sets are often found by recursive algorithms like iterated removal of strictly dominated strategies in strategic games, or backward induction in extensive games. Standard logical analyses of solution sets use assumptions about players in fixed epistemic models for a given game, such as mutual knowledge of rationality. In this paper, we propose a different perspective, analyzing solution algorithms as processes of learning which change game models. Thus, strategic equilibrium gets linked to fixed-points of operations of repeated announcement of suitable epistemic statements. This dynamic stance provides a new look at the current interface of games, logic, and computation.
On the Decomposition of Differential Game

Nanxiang Zhou,Jing Dong,Yutian Li,Baoxiang Wang

2024-11-06

Abstract:To understand the complexity of the dynamic of learning in differential games, we decompose the game into components where the dynamic is well understood. One of the possible tools is Helmholtz's theorem, which can decompose a vector field into a potential and a harmonic component. This has been shown to be effective in finite and normal-form games. However, applying Helmholtz's theorem by connecting it with the Hodge theorem on $\mathbb{R}^n$ (which is the strategy space of differential game) is non-trivial due to the non-compactness of $\mathbb{R}^n$. Bridging the dynamic-strategic disconnect through Hodge/Helmoltz's theorem in differential games is then left as an open problem \cite{letcher2019differentiable}. In this work, we provide two decompositions of differential games to answer this question: the first as an exact scalar potential part, a near vector potential part, and a non-strategic part; the second as a near scalar potential part, an exact vector potential part, and a non-strategic part. We show that scalar potential games coincide with potential games proposed by \cite{monderer1996potential}, where the gradient descent dynamic can successfully find the Nash equilibrium. For the vector potential game, we show that the individual gradient field is divergence-free, in which case the gradient descent dynamic may either be divergent or recurrent.

Computer Science and Game Theory,Machine Learning
Languages of Play: Towards semantic foundations for game interfaces

Chris Martens,Matthew A. Hammer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.05410

2017-03-15

Programming Languages

Abstract:Formal models of games help us account for and predict behavior, leading to more robust and innovative designs. While the games research community has proposed many formalisms for both the "game half" (game models, game description languages) and the "human half" (player modeling) of a game experience, little attention has been paid to the interface between the two, particularly where it concerns the player expressing her intent toward the game. We describe an analytical and computational toolbox based on programming language theory to examine the phenomenon sitting between control schemes and game rules, which we identify as a distinct player intent language for each game.
Efficient Subgame Refinement for Extensive-form Games.

Zhenxing Ge,Zheng Xu,Tianyu Ding,Wenbin Li,Yang Gao

2023-01-01

Abstract:Subgame solving is an essential technique in addressing large imperfect information games, with various approaches developed to enhance the performance of refined strategies in the abstraction of the target subgame. However, directly applying existing subgame solving techniques may be difficult, due to the intricate nature and substantial size of many real-world games. To overcome this issue, recent subgame solving methods allow for subgame solving on limited knowledge order subgames, increasing their applicability in large games; yet this may still face obstacles due to extensive information set sizes. To address this challenge, we propose a generative subgame solving (GS2) framework, which utilizes a generation function to identify a subset of the earliest-reached nodes, reducing the size of the subgame. Our method is supported by a theoretical analysis and employs a diversity-based generation function to enhance safety. Experiments conducted on medium-sized games as well as the challenging large game of GuanDan demonstrate a significant improvement over the blueprint.
Intention Games: Towards Strategic Coexistence between Partially Honest and Blind Players

Aditya Ahuja

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.09259

2017-12-26

Computer Science and Game Theory

Abstract:Strategic interactions between competitive entities are generally considered from the perspective of complete revelation of benefits achieved from those interactions, in the form of public payoff functions and/or beliefs, in the announced games. However, there exist strategic interplays between competitors where the players have a choice to strategise under the availability of private payoffs, in similar competitive settings. In this contribution, we propose a formal framework for a competitive ecosystem where each player is permitted to defect from publicly optimal strategies under certain private payoffs greater than announced payoffs, given that these defections have certain acceptable bounds in the long run as agreed by all players. We call this game theoretic construction an Intention Game. We formally define an Intention Game, and notions of participational equilibria that exist in such interactions that permit public defections. We compare Intention Games with conventional strategic form games, and demonstrate a type-theoretic construction of Intention Games. In a partially honest setting, we give Intention Game instances of a Cournot competition, secure interactions between mobile applications, an Internet services' data sourcing competition between Internet service providers through content delivery networks, and a Bitcoin mining competition. We give a use of Intention Games to determine player participation in a cryptographic protocol. Finally, we demonstrate the possibility of a dual model of the Intention Games framework.
Impartial games with entailing moves

Urban Larsson,Richard J. Nowakowski,Carlos P. Santos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.11699

2021-01-28

Abstract:Combinatorial Game Theory has also been called `additive game theory', whenever the analysis involves sums of independent game components. Such {\em disjunctive sums} invoke comparison between games, which allows abstract values to be assigned to them. However, there are rulesets with {\em entailing moves} that break the alternating play axiom and/or restrict the other player's options within the disjunctive sum components. These situations are exemplified in the literature by a ruleset such as {\sc nimstring}, a normal play variation of the classical children's game {\sc dots \& boxes}, and {\sc top~entails}, an elegant ruleset introduced in the classical work Winning Ways, by Berlekamp Conway and Guy. Such rulesets fall outside the scope of the established normal play theory. Here, we axiomatize normal play via two new terminating games, $\infty$ (Left wins) and $\overline\infty$ (Right wins), and a more general theory is achieved. We define {\em affine impartial}, which extends classical impartial games, and we analyze their algebra by extending the established Sprague-Grundy theory, with an accompanying minimum excluded rule. Solutions of {\sc nimstring} and {\sc top~entails} are given to illustrate the theory.

Combinatorics,Discrete Mathematics
Geometry of Set Functions in Game Theory: Combinatorial and Computational Aspects

Dylan Laplace Mermoud

2023-10-03

Abstract:The main ambition of this thesis is to contribute to the development of cooperative game theory towards combinatorics, algorithmics and discrete geometry. Therefore, the first chapter of this manuscript is devoted to highlighting the geometric nature of the coalition functions of transferable utility games and spotlights the existing connections with the theory of submodular set functions and polyhedral geometry. To deepen the links with polyhedral geometry, we define a new family of polyhedra, called the basic polyhedra, on which we can apply a generalized version of the Bondareva-Shapley Theorem to check their nonemptiness. To allow a practical use of these computational tools, we present an algorithmic procedure generating the minimal balanced collections, based on Peleg's method. Subsequently, we apply the generalization of the Bondareva-Shapley Theorem to design a collection of algorithmic procedures able to check properties or generate specific sets of coalitions. In the next chapter, the connections with combinatorics are investigated. First, we prove that the balanced collections form a combinatorial species, and we construct the one of k-uniform hypergraphs of size p, as an intermediary step to construct the species of balanced collections. Afterwards, a few results concerning resonance arrangements distorted by games are introduced, which gives new information about the space of preimputations and the facial configuration of the core. Finally, we address the question of core stability using the results from the previous chapters. Firstly, we present an algorithm based on Grabisch and Sudhölter's nested balancedness characterization of games with a stable core, which extensively uses the generalization of the Bondareva-Shapley Theorem introduced in the second chapter. Secondly, a new necessary condition for core stability is described, based on the application ...

Computer Science and Game Theory,Theoretical Economics,Combinatorics
Games in Dynamic‐Epistemic Logic

Johan Van Benthem

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8586.00133

2001-01-01

Bulletin of Economic Research

Abstract:The author discusses games of both perfect and imperfect information at two levels of structural detail: players’ local actions, and their global powers for determining outcomes of the game. Matching logical languages are proposed for both. In particular, at the ‘action level’, imperfect information games naturally model a combined ‘dynamic‐epistemic language’– and correspondences are found between special axioms in this language and particular modes of playing games with their information dynamics. At the ‘outcome level’, the paper presents suitable notions of game equivalence, and some simple representation results.

Refining Constructive Hybrid Games

Differential Hybrid Games

Hybrid-Dynamic Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse Games

Modelling Simultaneous Games in Dynamic Logic

Deciding the synthesis problem for hybrid games through bisimulation

Synchronous Games, Simulations and lambda-calculus

Game Solution, Epistemic Dynamics and Fixed-Point Logics

A Game Perspective of Refinement of Component Models

Two-Player Zero-Sum Hybrid Games

Constructive comparison in bidding combinatorial games

Diegetic Representation of Feedback in Open Games

Complete Dynamic Logic of Communicating Hybrid Programs

Affine Normal Play

Erratum: "rational dynamics and epistemic logic in games"

On the Decomposition of Differential Game

Languages of Play: Towards semantic foundations for game interfaces

Efficient Subgame Refinement for Extensive-form Games.

Intention Games: Towards Strategic Coexistence between Partially Honest and Blind Players

Impartial games with entailing moves

Geometry of Set Functions in Game Theory: Combinatorial and Computational Aspects

Games in Dynamic‐Epistemic Logic