Comparing 1-year GUMICS-4 simulations of the Terrestrial Magnetosphere with Cluster Measurements
Gabor Facsko,David Sibeck,Ilja Honkonen,Jozsef Bor,German Farinas Perez,Aniko Timar,Yuri Shprits,Pyry Peitso,Laura Degener,Eija Tanskanen,Chandrasekhar Reddy Anekallu,Sandor Szalai,Arpad Kis,Viktor Wesztergom,Akos Madar,Nikolett Biro,Gergely Koban,Andras Illyes,Peter Kovacs,Zsuzsanna Dalya,Munkhjargal Lkhagvadorj
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10507311.1
2023-05-05
Abstract:We compare the predictions of the GUMICS$-$4 global magnetohydrodynamic model for the interaction of the solar wind with the Earth's magnetosphere with Cluster~SC3 measurements for over one year, from January 29, 2002, to February 2, 2003. In particular, we compare model predictions with the north/south component of the magnetic field ($B_{z}$) seen by the magnetometer, the component of the velocity along the Sun-Earth line ($V_{x}$), and the plasma density as determined from a top hat plasma spectrometer and the spacecraft's potential from the electric field instrument. We select intervals in the solar wind, the magnetosheath, and the magnetosphere where these instruments provided good-quality data, and the model correctly predicted the region in which the spacecraft is located. We determine the location of the bow shock, the magnetopause, and the neutral sheet from the spacecraft measurements and compare these locations to those predicted by the simulation. The GUMICS$-$4 model agrees well with the measurements in the solar wind however its accuracy is worse in the magnetosheath. The simulation results are not realistic in the magnetosphere. The bow shock location is predicted well, however, the magnetopause location is less accurate. The neutral sheet positions are located quite accurately thanks to the special solar wind conditions when the $B_{y}$ component of the interplanetary magnetic field is small.
Space Physics