Improving Pest Monitoring Networks in order to reduce pesticide use in agriculture

Marie-Josée Cros,Jean-Noël Aubertot,Sabrina Gaba,Xavier Reboud,Régis Sabbadin,Nathalie Peyrard
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2002.00951
2020-02-04
Abstract:Disease and pest control largely rely on pesticides use and progress still remains to be made towards more sustainable practices. Pest Monitoring Networks (PMNs) can provide useful information for improving crop protection by restricting pesticide use to the situations that best require it. However, the efficacy of a PMN to control pests may depend on its spatial density and space/time sampling balance. Furthermore the best trade-off between the monitoring effort and the impact of the PMN information may be pest dependent. We developed a generic simulation model that links PMN information to treatment decisions and pest dynamics. We derived the number of treatments, the epidemic extension and the global gross margin for different families of pests. For soil-borne pathogens and weeds, we found that increasing the spatial density of a PMN significantly decreased the number of treatments (up to 67\%), with an only marginal increase in infection. Considering past observations had a second-order effect (up to a 13\% decrease). For the spatial scale of our study, the PMN information had practically no influence in the case of insects. The next step is to go beyond PMN analysis to design and chose among sustainable management strategies at the landscape scale.
Populations and Evolution,Applications
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to provide sufficient meaningful information to control pests and diseases and reduce the use of pesticides in agriculture by optimizing the structure of Pest Monitoring Networks (PMNs). Specifically, the author developed a stochastic simulation model, explored eight PMN structures with different spatial and temporal densities, and evaluated the efficiency of these structures in controlling three pest and disease families with different diffusion capabilities. The evaluation criteria include the proportion of infected fields, the proportion of fields receiving treatment, and the economic benefits of farmers. ### Research Background and Motivation Climate change is considered to be the main cause of emerging or re - emerging diseases and animal pests and diseases in agriculture, and it also affects the geographical distribution of weeds, which has an adverse impact on food security. Currently, pest and disease control mainly depends on the use of pesticides, which has been confirmed to have harmful effects on biodiversity and human health. Therefore, sustainable pest and disease management strategies are required. One way to achieve this goal is to obtain accurate information about pest and disease dynamics, which is usually provided by Pest Monitoring Systems (PMS). PMS can monitor major pests and diseases in commercial fields and provide useful information for crop protection, thus limiting the use of pesticides only when they are most needed. ### Research Methods The author used a model based on Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN), which can simulate the spatio - temporal dynamics of pests and diseases among fields. The model takes into account different types of pests and diseases (such as soil - borne pathogens, weeds, and insects), which have significant differences in diffusion capabilities and survival times. The model also includes a decision - making rule, which decides whether to take treatment measures based on the public information provided by PMN and the private field hygiene status information of decision - makers. ### Main Findings 1. **Soil - borne Pathogens and Weeds**: - Increasing the spatial density of PMN significantly reduces the number of treatments (up to 67%), while the increase in the infection rate is very limited. - Considering past observation data has a relatively small impact on reducing the number of treatments (up to 13%). 2. **Insects**: - For the studied spatial scale, the information provided by PMN has an almost negligible impact on insects. - When no treatment measures are used, the proportion of infected fields is as high as 78.1%, much higher than that of soil - borne pathogens (16.0%) and weeds (50.3%). - Due to the high short - distance and long - distance diffusion capabilities of insects, even with PMN information, the treatment frequency cannot be significantly reduced. ### Conclusions and Discussions By optimizing the structure of PMN, the effect of pest and disease control can be significantly improved, especially for soil - borne pathogens and weeds. However, for insects, the existing PMN structure may not be sufficient to provide enough information to effectively reduce the use of pesticides. Future research needs to further explore how to design more effective PMNs to adapt to different types of pests and diseases and promote sustainable pest and disease management strategies on a larger scale.