Housing Investment, Stock Market Participation and Household Portfolio choice: Evidence from China's Urban Areas

Huirong Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.01641
2020-01-07
Abstract:This paper employs the survey data of CHFS (2013) to investigate the impact of housing investment on household stock market participation and portfolio choice. The results show that larger housing investment encourages the household participation in the stock market, but reduces the proportion of their stockholding. The above conclusion remains true even when the endogeneity problem is controlled with risk attitude classification, Heckman model test and subsample regression. This study shows that the growth in the housing market will not lead to stock market development because of lack of household financial literacy and the low expected yield on stock market.
General Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is the impact of housing investment on household stock market participation and asset allocation choices. Specifically, the author aims to answer this question by studying the following aspects: 1. **Does housing investment affect the probability of households participating in the stock market?** 2. **Does housing investment affect the proportion of household investment in the stock market?** ### Background and Motivation In China, since the beginning of the 21st century, the real estate market has been booming, and property has become an important component of household assets. However, at the same time, China's stock market and other financial product markets have been relatively sluggish. This phenomenon has sparked discussions about whether the real estate market has a "crowding-out effect" on other financial markets. Specifically, does the prosperity of the real estate market inhibit household participation and investment in the stock market? ### Research Methods To answer the above questions, the author used data from the 2013 China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) and conducted the analysis through the following methods: 1. **Probit Regression**: Used to analyze the impact of housing investment on the probability of household participation in the stock market. 2. **Tobit Regression**: Used to analyze the impact of housing investment on the proportion of household investment in the stock market. 3. **Heckman Two-Step Method**: Used to address sample selection bias and data censoring issues. ### Main Findings 1. **Impact of Housing Investment on Household Stock Market Participation**: - Housing investment increases the probability of household participation in the stock market. Specifically, for every standard deviation increase in housing investment (approximately 367,000 yuan), the probability of households holding stocks increases by 4.5%. 2. **Impact of Housing Investment on Household Stock Investment Proportion**: - Housing investment decreases the proportion of household investment in the stock market. Specifically, for every standard deviation increase in housing investment, the proportion of household stock investment decreases by 3.8%. ### Interpretation These results indicate that housing investment has a dual impact on household stock market participation and investment proportion: - **Wealth Effect**: The substantial returns from housing investment increase household wealth, thereby raising the probability of household participation in the stock market. - **Crowding-Out Effect**: The high returns and low-risk characteristics of housing investment attract household funds, thereby reducing the proportion of household investment in the stock market. ### Conclusion The study points out that although housing investment increases the probability of household participation in the stock market, it also reduces the proportion of household investment in the stock market. This indicates that the impact of housing investment on household stock market participation and investment proportion is complex, with both positive "wealth effects" and negative "crowding-out effects." Additionally, the study emphasizes that the lack of household financial literacy and the low expected returns of the stock market are important reasons for this phenomenon.