P279 Excessive accumulation of neutrophils in the epithelium, but not lamina propria, predicts resistance to ustekinumab in ulcerative colitis

A Saifuddin,N Powell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0409
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background Many patients experience primary treatment resistance when treated with ustekinumab for ulcerative colitis (UC). Predictive clinical parameters would allow such individuals to be identified pre-treatment so alternative strategies could be initiated. We explored the utility of the different histological features present in baseline samples to predict ustekinumab resistance. Methods We assessed the total Geboes score (TG) (0–22, least to most severe), and the epithelial and lamina propria neutrophil subscores (EpiN and LpN, respectively) (both 0–3) in a subset of patients with moderate-to-severely active UC (n = 448) enrolled in the phase 3 UNIFI study that evaluated the efficacy of ustekinumab therapy. We explored the relationships between histological parameters and clinical indices of activity, including faecal calprotectin (FCP), CRP, Mayo score, and treatment outcomes (clinical remission, endoscopic healing and mucosal healing at week 8, and disease clearance, which combines these all) using Spearman rank correlation. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analyses were performed (presented with 95% confidence interval, CI). Analyses were performed using R 4.2.3 (Vienna, Austria) and GraphPad Prism (v 9.5.1). Results TG correlated highly with EpiN (ρ = 0.804, p < 0.0001) but did not correlate with LpN (ρ = 0.082, p = 0.07). Neither EpiN (ρ = 0.081, p = 0.09) nor LpN (ρ = -0.011, P = 0.82) correlated with FCP, though EpiN correlated weakly with log10FCP (ρ = 0.113, p = 0.017). Full Mayo score correlated with EpiN (ρ = 0.23, p < 0.0001) and TG (ρ = 0.23, < 0.0001). Of the patients with pre-treatment EpiN of 0, 23.1%, 26.9%, 23.1% and 19.2% experienced clinical remission, endoscopic healing, mucosal healing and disease clearance, respectively. Response rates incrementally reduced as EpiN increased, such that 4.2%, 12.5%, 8.3% and 4.2% of patients with EpiN of 3 achieved these outcomes, respectively. Similar trends were seen with tertiles of TG, though not with LpN. EpiN and TG predict mucosal healing with AUC 0.59 (CI: 0.50 - 0.68; p = 0.044) and 0.61 (CI: 0.52 - 0.70; p = 0.016), respectively. The addition of other clinical variables did not improve performance of the models. Conclusion There is weak or insignificant correlation between Geboes score parameters and other clinical indices of UC activity. EpiN and TG, but not LpN, stratify patients’ response to ustekinumab, with almost 6-fold difference in clinical remission between high and low EpiN. TG and EpiN predict resistance to ustekinumab, suggesting that the epithelial inflammatory milieu may be key to driving resistance to ustekinumab and possibly other therapies. This supports recent evidence highlighting the role of neutrophils in resistant UC.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?