Abstract:Paulus AF Geerts, 1 Trudy van der Weijden, 2 Wilma Savelberg, 3 Melis Altan, 4 Giorgio Chisari, 4 Diana Ricarda Launert, 4 Hannah Mesters, 4 Ylva Pisters, 4 Mike van Heumen, 4 Raoul Hermanns, 4 Gerard MJ Bos, 1 Albine Moser 2, 5 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and School GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; 2 Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, School CAPHRI, Maastricht, the Netherlands; 3 Oncology Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; 4 Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; 5 Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, the Netherlands Correspondence: Paulus AF Geerts Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and School GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands Tel +31 6 20661124 Email Background: Patient-centeredness is essential in complex oncological multidisciplinary team decision-making. Improvement seems to be needed, while there is a lack of knowledge about health care providers' needs for improvement. Objective: To explore multidisciplinary team members' perspectives on the need to improve patient-centeredness in complex decision-making, and subsequently the strategies to enhance it. Methods: This was a qualitative descriptive interview study. The participants were twenty-four professionals who attended multidisciplinary cancer team meetings weekly. The setting was five multidisciplinary teams (gastrointestinal, gynecological, urological, head and neck, and hematological cancer) in a Dutch academic hospital. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews and were analyzed with a combination of inductive and deductive content analysis. Results: The participants voiced the need for additional information (patient-centered information, patients's needs and preferences, individualized medical information) during the multidisciplinary team meeting, to be more patient-centered in the decision-making conversation with the patient following the meeting, and for more information following the meeting to support patient-centeredness. The strategies, which mostly originated from the needs, were categorized as organization, decision-making, and communication. The most prominent strategies were those aimed at collecting and using patient-centered information, and to facilitate the decision-making conversation with the patient following the multidisciplinary team meeting. Conclusion: Our findings highlighted the need to improve patient-centeredness in oncological multidisciplinary teams and provided a comprehensive overview of strategies for improvement, supported by multidisciplinary team members. These strategies emphasize involvement of patients throughout the continuous process of decision-making for patients with cancer. These strategies may be implemented in other oncological multidisciplinary teams, taking in mind the local needs. Future research may help to prioritize the strategies and to determine and evaluate the effect on endpoints, like patient or professional satisfaction, shared decision-making, and on the decision that was made. Keywords: patient-centered care, decision-making, patient care team, cancer, patient care, multidisciplinary team Patient-centeredness has been designated to improve health care quality and equality. Patient-centeredness means that health care becomes more oriented to the patient as an individual and aims to be respectful and empowering. It implies the individual participation of the patient and is built on a relationship of mutual trust, sensitivity, empathy, and shared knowledge. Important decisions in the care for cancer patients are usually first discussed within a multidisciplinary team meeting: a meeting with different clinicians that are experts on the disease, diagnostics, and treatments. Thereafter, the team's diagnostic or treatment recommendations are discussed with the patients. It is known that patient-centeredness may need to be improved in team meetings. Therefore, we explored the needs of the team clinicians regarding improvements in patient-centeredness and discussed possible strategies for improvement with them. We interviewed 24 clinicians with different background specialties from five multidisciplinary teams involving different types of cancer. The clinicians needed more information about the patient as a person to base their recommendations on, for example, information about the situation at home, or thoughts of the patient about p -Abstract Truncated-

Interruptions in multidisciplinary tumor conferences with patient participation: A video interaction analysis

Provider interruptions and patient perceptions of care: an observational study in the emergency department

Analysis of communication styles underpinning clinical decision-making in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings

Development and implementation of a student tumor board as a teaching format for medical students

Treatment confidence and patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences: A structural equation modeling approach

Digital participatory workshops with patients and health professionals to develop an intervention for the management of polypharmacy: results from a mixed-methods evaluation and methodological conclusions

Medical and Nonmedical Information during Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Cancer Care

Tumor board simulation improves interdisciplinary decision-making in medical students

Exploring non-physician care professionals' roles in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: A qualitative study

The Next Step Toward Patient-Centeredness in Multidisciplinary Cancer Team Meetings: An Interview Study with Professionals

Effects of a shared decision‐making implementation programme on patient‐centred communication in oncology—Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial

Benefits, barriers and opinions on multidisciplinary team meetings: a survey in Swedish cancer care

Technology enhanced multidisciplinary cancer conferences in gynecologic oncology.

Synchronous communication facilitates interruptive workflow for attending physicians and nurses in clinical settings

Influence of doctor-patient conversations on behaviours of patients presenting to primary care with new or persistent symptoms: a video observation study

Abstract 4973: Impact of technology on quality of thoracic multidisciplinary cancer conferences

Lost in translation? Information exchange during breast cancer care and implications for technology design.

Undergraduate Nursing Students and Management of Interruptions: Preparation of Students for Future Workplace Realities

QOL-48. NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTION FOR PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR PATIENTS AND SURVIVORS - A PRE-STUDY WITH A FOCUS ON PATIENT INVOLVEMENT

Barriers and opportunities for implementation of a brief psychological intervention for post-ICU mental distress in the primary care setting – results from a qualitative sub-study of the PICTURE trial

Preparing Patients to Communicate with Their Doctors About Clinical Trials as a Treatment Option: Impact of a Novel Video Intervention for Patients with a Blood Cancer and Their Caregivers