Abstract:<ol class=""><li>It is now commonplace in community ecology to assess patterns of phylogenetic or functional diversity in order to inform our understanding of the assembly mechanisms that structure communities. While both phylogenetic and functional approaches have been used in conceptually similar ways, it is not clear if they both in fact reveal similar community diversity patterns or support similar inferences. We review studies that use both measures to determine the degree to which they support congruent patterns and inferences about communities.</li><li>We performed a literature review with 188 analyses from 79 published papers that compared some facet of phylogenetic (PD) and functional diversity (FD) in community ecology. These studies generally report four main cases in which phylogenetic and functional information are used together in community analyses, to determine if: (a) there were phylogenetic signals in the measured traits in communities; (b) PD and FD were correlated with one another; (c) standardized PD and FD measures similarly revealed patterns of community over‐ or under‐dispersion; and (d) PD and FD were both related to other explanatory variables (e.g. elevation) similarly.</li><li>We found that the vast majority of studies found both strong phylogenetic signals in their traits and positive correlations of PD and FD measures across sites. However, and surprisingly, we found substantial incongruencies for the other tests. Phylogenetic and functional dispersion patterns were congruent only about half the time. Specifically, when communities were phylogenetically over‐dispersed, these same communities were more likely to be functionally under‐dispersed. Similarly, we found that phylogenetic and functional relationships with independent predictors were incongruent in about half of the analyses.</li><li><i>Synthesis</i>. Phylogenetic signal tests and PD–FD correlations appear to strongly support the congruence between traits and phylogeny. It is surprising that strong phylogenetic signals appeared so ubiquitous given that ecological studies often analyse phylogenetically incomplete sets of species that have undergone ecological sorting. Despite the largely congruent findings based on phylogenetic signal tests and PD‐FD correlations, we found substantial incongruencies when researchers assessed either dispersion patterns or relationships with independent predictors. We discuss a number of potential ecological, evolutionary and methodological reasons for these incongruencies. Phylogenetic and functional information might reflect species ecological differences unequally with phylogenies better reflecting multivariate conserved elements of ecological similarity, and single traits better able to capture recent divergence, and both elements influence ecological patterns. </li></ol>

For common community phylogenetic analyses, go ahead and use synthesis phylogenies

Constructing and Employing Tree Alignment Graphs for Phylogenetic Synthesis

The promise and pitfalls of synteny in phylogenomics

No substitute for real data: phylogenies from birth-death polytomy resolvers should not be used for many downstream comparative analyses

A tale of too many trees: a conundrum for phylogenetic regression

[Introduction to the Methods of Constructing Phylogenetic Trees with DNA Sequences].

OrthoPhyl – Streamlining large scale, orthology-based phylogenomic studies of bacteria at broad evolutionary scales

Integrating Phylogenies with Chronology to Assemble the Tree of Life

Co-Phylog: an Assembly-Free Phylogenomic Approach for Closely Related Organisms

Phylogenomics with Paralogs

Plastome‐based phylogeny improves community phylogenetics of subtropical forests in China

Estimating phylogenies from genomes: A beginners review of commonly used genomic data in vertebrate phylogenomics

Complex Models of Sequence Evolution Improve Fit, but not Gene Tree Discordance, for Tetrapod Mitogenomes

Estimating phylogenetic trees from genome-scale data

Using PhyloSuite for Molecular Phylogeny and Tree‐based Analyses

Statistical Phylogenetic Tree Analysis Using Differences of Means

Do traits and phylogeny support congruent community diversity patterns and assembly inferences?

The Use of DNA Barcodes to Estimate Phylogenetic Diversity in Forest Communities of Southern China

Phylogenetic tree statistics: a systematic overview using the new R package ‘treestats’

The Role of Phylogeny in Quantitative Paleobiological Data Analysis

EasyCGTree: a pipeline for prokaryotic phylogenomic analysis based on core gene sets