Assessing Sustainability Factors for Rural Household Sanitation Coverage in Bhutan, Kenya, Nepal, and Zambia: A Qualitative Analysis
Zoe Sakas,Eberechukwu A. Uwah,Raj Kumar Bhattrai,Joshua V. Garn,Anna Mutta,Kumbulani Ndlovu,Fanuel Nyaboro,Ram Prakash Singh,Ugyen Rinzin,Jedidiah S. Snyder,Kencho Wangdi,Matthew C. Freeman,Krishna Hari Gc
DOI: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00724
2022-12-22
Abstract:Background:Few countries are likely to achieve universal sanitation within the next decade as sustaining household sanitation coverage remains a critical challenge. This study aimed to investigate factors that may have supported or hindered sustainability of sanitation coverage 1–2 years after the completion of an integrated, area-wide sanitation program in 4 countries.Methods:We conducted qualitative analyses to identify factors related to the sustainability of sanitation coverage in Bhutan, Kenya, Nepal, and Zambia, 2 years after completion of the Sustainable Sanitation and Hygiene for All program. From November 2019 to March 2020, we conducted focus group discussions and key informant interviews with community members, project implementers, and decision makers. We triangulated the qualitative findings with data from household surveys to characterize subnational sanitation coverage throughout implementation and 1–2 years after.Results:Our data revealed behavioral, contextual, and service delivery factors that were related to the sustainability of sanitation improvements. Service delivery factors included follow-up hygiene promotion, access to construction materials, local government commitment postimplementation, functioning monitoring systems, private sector uptake of supply chain improvements, and capacity for innovation. Contextual and behavioral factors included poverty, soil type, road networks, social cohesion, desire for improved latrines, maintenance and cleaning, and knowledge of sanitation benefits.Conclusion:The presence or absence of sustainability factors identified through this research may have implications on where certain programmatic approaches will work and where adaptations may be required. By comparing sustainability factors with subnational slippage rates, we were able to illustrate how local service delivery systems may respond to barriers and enablers. Understanding the programmatic and contextual factors that either drive or hinder long-term sanitation coverage may allow for greater program impact through adapting implementation based on existing challenges in service delivery and context.