Abstract:Materials discovery lays the foundation for many technological advancements. Predicting and discovering new materials are not simple tasks. We here outline some basic principles of solid-state chemistry, which might help to advance both, and discuss pitfalls and challenges in materials discovery. Using the recent work of Szymanski et al., which reported the autonomous discovery of 43 novel materials, as an example, we discuss problems that can arise in unsupervised materials discovery, and hope that by addressing these, autonomous materials discovery can be brought closer to reality. We discuss all 43 synthetic products and point out four common shortfalls in the analysis. These errors unfortunately lead to the conclusion that no new materials have been discovered in that work. We conclude that there are two important points of improvement that require future work from the community: (i) automated Rietveld analysis of powder x-ray diffraction data is not yet reliable. Future improvement of such, and the development of a reliable artificial intelligence-based tool for Rietveld fitting, would be very helpful, not only to autonomous materials discovery, but also the community in general. (ii) We find that disorder in materials is often neglected in predictions. The predicted compounds investigated herein have all their elemental components located on distinct crystallographic positions, but in reality, elements can share crystallographic sites, resulting in higher symmetry space groups and - very often - known alloys or solid solutions. This error might be related to the difficulty of modeling disorder in a computationally economical way, and needs to be addressed both by computational and experimental material scientists. We find that two-thirds of the claimed successful materials in Szymanski et al are likely to be known, compositionally disordered versions of the predicted, ordered compounds. We highlight important issues in materials discovery, computational chemistry, and autonomous interpretation of x-ray diffraction. We discuss concepts of materials discovery from an experimentalist point of view, which we hope will be helpful for the community to further advance this important new aspect of our field.

Challenges and opportunities for AI in synthetic solid-state inorganic chemistry

AI in Chemical Engineering: A New Chapter of Innovation

The promise and pitfalls of AI for molecular and materials synthesis

Toward autonomous design and synthesis of novel inorganic materials.

Artificial Intelligence Meets Chemistry

AI for organic and polymer synthesis

Spiers Memorial Lecture: How to do impactful research in artificial intelligence for chemistry and materials science

New Era of Artificial Chemist

The Future of Material Scientists in an Age of Artificial Intelligence

Towards AI Research Agents in the Chemical Sciences

Artificial-Intelligence-Driven Organic Synthesis-En Route towards Autonomous Synthesis?

In Silico Chemical Experiments in the Age of AI: From Quantum Chemistry to Machine Learning and Back

Artificial Intelligence in Chemistry: Current Trends and Future Directions

Challenges in high-throughput inorganic material prediction and autonomous synthesis

How to do impactful research in artificial intelligence for chemistry and materials science.

The curiosity-creativity element in HI-AI materials discovery

The ScholarNet and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Supervisor in Material Science Research

Nanoarchitectonics: the role of artificial intelligence in the design and application of nanoarchitectures

Scientific AI in materials science: a path to a sustainable and scalable paradigm

Role of AI in experimental materials science