Abstract:The experimental stress-strain curves from the standardized tests of Tensile, Plane Stress, Compression, Volumetric Compression, and Shear, are normally used to obtain the invariant λi and constants of material Ci that will define the behavior elastomers. Obtaining these experimental curves requires the use of expensive and complex experimental equipment. For years, a direct method called model updating, which is based on the combination of parameterized finite element (FE) models and experimental force-displacement curves, which are simpler and more economical than stress-strain curves, has been used to obtain the Ci constants. Model updating has the disadvantage of requiring a high computational cost when it is used without the support of any known optimization method or when the number of standardized tests and required Ci constants is high. This paper proposes a methodology that combines the model updating method, the mentioned standardized tests and the multi-response surface method (MRS) with desirability functions to automatically determine the most appropriate Ci constants for modeling the behavior of a group of elastomers. For each standardized test, quadratic regression models were generated for modeling the error functions (ER), which represent the distance between the force-displacement curves that were obtained experimentally and those that were obtained by means of the parameterized FE models. The process of adjusting each Ci constant was carried out with desirability functions, considering the same value of importance for all of the standardized tests. As a practical example, the proposed methodology was validated with the following elastomers: nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA), styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) and polyurethane (PUR). Mooney–Rivlin, Ogden, Arruda–Boyce and Gent were considered as the hyper-elastic models for modeling the mechanical behavior of the mentioned elastomers. The validation results, after the Ci parameters were adjusted, showed that the Mooney–Rivlin model was the hyper-elastic model that has the least error of all materials studied (MAEnorm = 0.054 for NBR, MAEnorm = 0.127 for NBR, MAEnorm = 0.116 for EVA and MAEnorm = 0.061 for NBR). The small error obtained in the adjustment of the Ci constants, as well as the computational cost of new materials, suggests that the methodology that this paper proposes could be a simpler and more economical alternative to use to obtain the optimal Ci constants of any type of elastomer than other more sophisticated methods.

Hyper-Elastic Characterization of Polydimethylsiloxane by Optimization Algorithms and Finite Element Methods

Refinement of Hyperelastic Models Based on Tension and Compression Experiments of Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)

Mechanical Behaviors of Copolymer Elastomers: Experimental Characterization and Constitutive Modelling

Elastic behavior of bimodal poly(dimethylsiloxane) networks

Synthesis, characterization and lubricating effect of long chain branched polydimethylsiloxane-g-polyethylene copolymers

Hysteresis in Glass Microsphere Filled Elastomers under Cyclic Loading

Elastic and Viscoelastic Characterization of Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) for Cell-Mechanics Applications

Experimental and Theoretical Study on Mechanical Properties of Porous PDMS

An Experimental Study on Stretchy and Tough PDMS/Fabric Composites

Understanding the Extraordinary Flexibility of Polydimethylsiloxane Through Single-Molecule Mechanics

Functional PDMS Elastomers: Bulk Composites, Surface Engineering, and Precision Fabrication

Multiscale mechanics of polydimethylsiloxane: A comparison of meso‐ and micro‐cyclic deformation behavior

Finite Element Model Updating Combined with Multi-Response Optimization for Hyper-Elastic Materials Characterization

Design of Intelligent Protective Composite Material with Stress Rate Sensitivity, Strong Interface Adhesion, and Recyclability

Hyperelastic constitutive model parameters identification using optical-based techniques and hybrid optimisation

Enhancing fracture toughness of polydimethylsiloxane with cyclosiloxane hybrid polymer microspheres

Polydimethylsiloxane mechanical properties: A systematic review

Healable, Recyclable and High‐stretchable Polydimethylsiloxane Elastomer Based on Synergistic Effects of Multiple Supramolecular Interactions

Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane/silica/polydimethylsiloxane Rubber Composites with Enhanced Mechanical and Thermal Properties

The optimization of mechanical properties of polypropylene/styrene butadiene rubber/silicon carbide nanocomposites using response surface methodology

Digital Light Processing 3D Printing of PDMS-Based Soft and Elastic Materials with Tunable Mechanical Properties