Quantifying long-term cloud feedback over East Asia combining with radiative kernels and CMIP6 data

Mengting Liu,Hua Zhang,Fang Wang,Zaizhi Wang,Fei Wang,Haibo Wang,Bing Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06577-7
IF: 4.901
2022-11-16
Climate Dynamics
Abstract:Understanding the cloud feedback (CFB) process remains a critical challenge for climate projection. While previous studies have mainly focused on the globe, the tropics, or the Southern Ocean, this study analyzes the long-term CFB over East Asia (EA) using data from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) and radiative kernels newly developed. We find that the overall CFBs over EA act to amplify warming in an annual scale, with mean values of 0.66 ± 0.47 and 0.63 ± 0.39 W m−2 K−1 for the SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, respectively, although remarkable seasonal discrepancies. There are two distinct subregions: the positive center over the East Asian monsoon region, primarily due to the significant reduction in low cloud cover; the negative center over the Tibet Plateau, largely owing to the reduced high cloud cover and the ice-to-liquid conversion of cloud phase. Furthermore, the CFB over EA changes from negative to positive in the early 1980s, and then enhance at a rate faster than the global average until the early years of the twenty-first century, which may be linked with the weakening and subsequent recovery of the East Asian summer monsoon. Generally, inter-kernel uncertainty is markedly smaller than inter-model uncertainty; however, in regional scale, inter-kernel uncertainty is larger and inter-model uncertainty is smaller than those in the global scale. This feature implies that ignoring inter-kernel uncertainty may bring additional errors to regional CFB quantification. Notably, these results are comparable between the SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, suggesting that CFB processes may be insensitive to emission scenarios.
meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?