Long-term medical and quality of life outcomes among voluntary liver donors

Abu Bakar Hafeez Bhatti,Wajih Naqvi,Maheen Mohsan,Moeza Iqbal,Eman Binte Arshad,Zainab Khan,Anum Waheed,Haseeb Haider Zia,Nusrat Yar khan,Abdul Wahab Yousafzai,Nasir Ayub Khan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.02.028
2024-02-01
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Abstract:Background Long-term medical and quality of life outcomes in voluntary liver donors remain under investigated. The objective of the current study was to report long-term medical outcomes and re-evaluate quality of life in living liver donors. Methods This was a single center retrospective cohort study of donors who underwent donor hepatectomy between 2012 and 2018. We investigated long-term outcomes in seven domains. These include medical problems, surgical procedures, work related issues, pregnancy outcomes, psychiatric interventions, willingness to donate again, and long-term mortality. Quality of life was evaluated using short-form 36. Results The median follow-up time was 61.4(53.3-83.7) months. Among 698 donors, 80 (11.5%) experienced medical problems, four (0.6%) had work related issues, and 20(2.9%) needed psychiatric assistance. Surgery was performed in 49(7%) donors, and females were more likely to have undergone incisional hernia repair (5.8% vs. 1.9%, P=0.006). There were 79 post-donation pregnancies including 41(51.9%) normal vaginal deliveries, 35(44.3%) cesarean sections, and three (3.8%) miscarriages. Willingness to donate again was reported by 658(94.3%) donors. Donors whose recipients were alive were more likely to donate again (95.5% vs. 90.5%, P=0.01). There were three (0.4%) deaths in the long-term. The mean physical composite score at initial and follow-up evaluation was 86.7±13.9 and 76.5± 20.9(P=0.001), and the mean mental composite score at initial and follow-up evaluation was 92.1± 13.5 and 80.7 ±16 (P=0.001). Conclusion The overall long-term outlook in living liver donors looks promising. Quality of life parameters might deteriorate over time and frequent re-evaluation might be considered.
gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?