Genetic Semantic Dementia? Twins' Data and Review of Autosomal Dominant Cases
Shalom K Henderson,Matthew A Lambon Ralph,P Simon Jones,Michelle Naessens,Thomas Cope,David J Whiteside,Arabella Bouzigues,Lucy L Russell,Phoebe H Foster,Eve Ferry-Bolder,John van Swieten,Lize Jiskoot,Harro Seelaar,Raquel Sanchez-Valle,Daniela Galimberti,Matthis Synofzik,Barbara Borroni,Jonathan D Rohrer,GENetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative (GENFI),James B Rowe,Karalyn E Patterson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.18.24313757
2024-10-18
Abstract:Background: Amongst different subtypes of frontotemporal dementia (FTD), semantic dementia (SD, also known as the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia, svPPA), is the least likely to have a genetic basis.
Methods: Our study had two aims: (i) to describe two SD cases and detailed assessments of their unaffected monozygotic (MZ) twins, and (ii) to review cases with FTD-associated mutations or known family history classified as SD/svPPA either in the Genetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative (GENFI) or in the published literature.
Results: The two affected twins displayed characteristic features of SD, both in neuroimaging and cognition, whereas their MZ twins exhibited no abnormalities in either regard, even up to 15 years of follow-up for one affected twin. Only five cases out of more than 1300 people in GENFI were classified as svPPA, with a genetic mutation. The systematic review revealed 29 cases with sufficient clinical and language details regarding 'genetic' SD/svPPA. A comparison of these five GENFI and 29 literature cases to the patterns observed in a large number of sporadic cases revealed critical differences in presentation.
Conclusions: Both parts of our study suggest that true SD/svPPA is unlikely to have an autosomal dominant genetic aetiology and that, while mutation carriers may resemble SD/svPPA in some respects, they may not meet current clinical diagnostic criteria for this condition.
Neurology