Initial clinical experience with durvalumab plus tremelimumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real‐world practice

Shigeo Shimose,Issei Saeki,Tetsu Tomonari,Takanori Ito,Joji Tani,Yasuto Takeuchi,Naoki Yoshioka,Takehito Naito,Mamiko Takeuchi,Satoru Kakizaki,Takeshi Hatanaka,Kyo Sasaki,Tetsuya Yasunaka,Masahiro Sakata,Hideki Iwamoto,Satoshi Itano,Tomotake Shirono,Norikazu Tanabe,Takafumi Yamamoto,Atsushi Naganuma,Soji Nishina,Motoyuki Otsuka,Hiroki Kawashima,Tetsuji Takayama,Taro Takami,Takumi Kawaguchi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2024.14530
2024-06-27
Oncology Letters
Abstract:Although durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur/Tre) has been approved as first‐line therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u‐HCC), its outcomes in real‐world clinical practice are unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dur/Tre treatment. This multicenter study was conducted between March 2023 and January 2024, and included 120 patients with u‐HCC treated with Dur/Tre. Among the patients, 44 had no history of systemic treatment. Progression‐free survival (PFS), therapeutic response and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were 15.8 and 53.3%, respectively. The median PFS was 3.9 months. The incidence rates of AEs of any grade and those grade 3 or higher were 83.3 and 36.7%, respectively. Liver injury was the most frequent AE of any grade and grade 3 or higher. Although there was no significant difference in ORR and PFS between the first and later line groups (ORR 15.8 vs. 15.7%, P=0.986; PFS 4.5 vs. 3.6 months, P=0.213), there was a significant difference in DCR between the two groups (65.8 vs. 45.9%, P=0.034). No significant differences were noted between the first‐ and later‐line treatment groups regarding the incidence rate of AEs. Decision tree analysis revealed that poor liver function and advanced age were significant variables for discontinuation owing to AEs. In conclusion, Dur/Tre as first‐line therapy had better disease control responses compared with later‐line therapy; however, this regimen should be carefully administered to patients with deteriorating hepatic function or advanced ag9
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?