Narrative or Facts: Two Paths to Vaccine Advocacy

Freddie J. Jennings Rebecca B. Leach Brandon Lawson Elizabeth Welch Anna Gentry Sarah Buechner Department of Communication,University of Arkansas,Fayetteville,USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2024.2408289
2024-09-26
Journal of Health Communication
Abstract:The current study investigated the effectiveness of factual and narrative messages in promoting advocacy intentions among viewers of COVID-19 vaccination messaging. In an online posttest only experiment on Qualtrics online software, participants ( N = 323) were randomly assigned to one of four conditions related to type of messaging (i.e. factual, narrative, both, control). The final model revealed that both types of messages work in generating advocacy but through two distinct influential pathways. Moreover, a message containing both facts and a narrative proved to be more effective than a message containing only a narrative or only facts.
information science & library science,communication
What problem does this paper attempt to address?