Abstract:The global shift towards renewable energy sources presents promising prospects for environmental sustainability and social welfare. However, without proper management, this transition risks exacerbating disparities, creating winners and losers in the process. Achieving a just energy transition demands equitable distribution of benefits and costs alongside inclusive decision-making processes. Nonetheless, transition dynamics vary widely across contexts, necessitating a nuanced understanding of local specificities. This study identifies and characterizes injustices within renewable energy projects in Africa through a systematic review of 26 studies from 11 countries. Using content and thematic analysis supported by Atlas.ti software, various forms of injustice — distributive, procedural, recognition, and restorative — were delineated. Distributive injustices accounted for 58 % of all injustices, while procedural, restorative and recognition injustices accounted for 18 %, 15 %, and 9 %, respectively. Distributive injustices primarily arose from project siting, resource conflicts, the objectives of the renewable energy projects (grid stability vs local connectivity), and disparities in job creation. Procedural injustices manifested as regime dominance and limited community participation. Restorative injustices often manifested as inadequate mitigative measures and compensation, while marginalization and inadequate representation of vulnerable and minority groups underscored recognition injustices. The effects of these injustices included inequalities (49 %), resource dispossession (18 %), institutional lock-in (12 %), resource strains (6 %), and migration of labor force (6 %), among others. Additionally, the study highlights potentially misconstrued injustices arising from local communities' misunderstanding of the objectives and benefits of renewable energy projects in their localities. Overall, the findings underscore the subjective and context-specific nature of justice in energy transitions, emphasizing the need to consider contextual factors when delineating what injustices are in clean energy initiatives across diverse African contexts.

The role of justice is set to shift accountability and responsibility in the energy sector

Resolving energy policy failure: Introducing energy justice as the solution to achieve a just transition

The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition

Just energy business needed! How to achieve a just energy transition by engaging energy companies in reaching climate neutrality: (re)conceptualising energy law for energy corporations

Winds of change: An engaged ethics approach to energy justice

Responsible sourcing for energy transitions: Discussing academic narratives of responsible sourcing through the lens of natural resources justice

Temporalities of energy justice: Changing justice conceptions in Dutch energy policy between 1974 and 2022

Restoring trust in ESG investing through the adoption of just transition ethics

Energy law for the next generation, towards 2030 to 2050

The Ethics of Climate Change, Climate Policy and Climate Justice

Rethinking justice as recognition in energy transitions and planned coal phase-out in Poland

Governance and Climate Justice

The effects of fair allocation principles on energy system model designs

Navigating tensions between rapid and just low-carbon transitions

Energy Justice and Equity: A Review of Definitions, Measures, and Practice in Policy, Planning, and Operations

On the Reform of Energy Law

Global Justice, Natural Resources, and Climate Change

Characterizing 'injustices' in clean energy transitions in Africa

Pathways Versus Incentives: Climate Activism to Climate Aligned Portfolio Management

Rethinking Corporate Social Responsibility in the Arena of Climate Change: A Study in Socio-Legal Aspect

Just transitions: Histories and futures in a post-COVID world