When Arguments Meet a Story: An Experiment Testing Message Design Strategies for Skin Cancer Prevention and Detection

Chun ZhouQinghua Yanga School of Communication,Florida International Universityb Department of Communication Studies,Texas Christian University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2315320

IF: 3.501

2024-02-09

Health Communication

Abstract:Persuasion research often suggests combining different message formats such as facts, statistics, and narratives in message design to maximize persuasive effects. However, the effect of the combination, especially between fact-based arguments and long-form narratives, varies depending on many factors which have been understudied. Our study therefore tested how argument strength, argument position, and target behavior interacted in impacting behavioral outcomes for such a combined message about skin cancer. Findings from our experiment revealed a significant three-way interaction, as weak arguments were more effective when embedding them in a long-form narrative, whereas strong arguments were more impactful when placing them before the narrative. Such an interaction emerged only when messages recommended sunscreen use but not when recommending skin-self exams. We discussed the implications of the findings for message design about skin cancer prevention and detection.

health policy & services,communication