Comparison of incident hypertension between SGLT2 inhibitors vs. DPP4 inhibitors

Yuta Suzuki,Hidehiro Kaneko,Akira Okada,Jin Komuro,Katsuhito Fujiu,Norifumi Takeda,Hiroyuki Morita,Junya Ako,Akira Nishiyama,Yuichiro Yano,Masaki Ieda,Koichi Node,Hideo Yasunaga,Issei Komuro
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01649-z
2024-04-10
Hypertension Research
Abstract:Although several randomized clinical trials have reported the potential benefit of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in reducing blood pressure (BP), whether SGLT2i can reduce incident hypertension is unknown. We analyzed individuals with diabetes who were newly prescribed SGLT2i or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) in a large-scale epidemiological database. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypertension. A propensity score matching algorithm was employed to compare the subsequent development of hypertension between the SGLT2i and DPP4i groups. After propensity score matching, 5708 well-balanced pairs of SGLT2i and DPP4i users were identified. SGLT2i administration was associated with a reduced risk of hypertension (HR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84–0.97). The advantage of SGLT2i use over DPP4i use for incident hypertension was generally consistent in several sensitivity analyses, and subgroup analyses showed that SGLT2i use was significantly associated with a lower risk of hypertension in men, patients with baseline HbA1c of <7.5%, and baseline systolic blood pressure ≥127 mmHg. Our investigation using nationwide real-world data demonstrated the potential advantage of SGLT2i over DPP4i in reducing the development of hypertension in individuals with diabetes.
peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?