Abstract:Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are characterized by idiopathic chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, comprising the two major entities ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). A series of studies have demonstrated that perturbations of the indigenous gut microbiota, persistent infections, environmental factors, and genetic variants contribute to dysregulated immune responses to microbiota, leading to the development of IBD.1, 2 The incidence and prevalence of IBD are increasing globally, particularly in developing countries. The precise etiologies and pathophysiology are unknown, and therefore medical therapy to cure these diseases is not yet available. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified > 240 genetic loci associated with human IBD. However, most IBD genetic associations have been derived using individuals from European (EUR) ancestries, with only a few studies of much smaller sample sizes in East Asian (EAS) ancestries, particularly the Chinese population.3, 4 Recently in Nat Genet, Liu et al. are the first to clarify the genetic architectures associated with human IBD using the largest samples from EAS ancestries including Chinese IBD patients.5 They identified 16 new genetic loci just across EAS ancestries. Variance explained for these IBD EAS loci across EUR and EAS was mainly by higher minor allele frequencies (MAFs) in EAS instead of similar effect sizes (average MAF 0.25 versus 0.17, two-sided paired t-test p = .015) (Figure 1), suggesting the importance of including global ancestries in genetic studies to ensure the relevance of the genetic findings.5 Furthermore, Liu et al. identified 81 new genetic loci associated with IBD across both EAS and EUR ancestries, thus increasing the number of IBD-associated genetic loci to 320 by comparing with 45 106 IBD cases and 353 562 healthy donors from East Asian countries (China, Korea and Japan), the International IBD Genetics Union (IIBDGC) and FinnGen.5 Variance explained by IBD-associated loci differs across EAS ancestries and EUR ancestries, which is, to a greater degree, driven by MAFs but less by the effect sizes (32% of IBD associations have different MAFs, and 22% have different odds ratios).5 Liu et al. have found that there is a comparable single nucleotide polymorphism-based heritability across EAS ancestries and EUR ancestries, indicating that the amount of genetic contribution to IBD is roughly the same across the two populations. Besides, Liu et al. found that the genetic effects of many IBD loci are consistent in both ancestries, with only a few loci as clear exceptions, for example, tumour necrosis factor super family 15 (TNFSF15), colony-stimulating factor 2 receptor subunit beta and interleukin 23 receptors. As the variance explained for IBD loci differs across ancestries, the ability to exploit genetic loci and predict an individual's disease risk of IBD also differs greatly. Liu et al. estimated this ability using polygenic risk score (PRS) and observed that PRS trained in the EUR population has a reduced accuracy in the EAS population. To some extent, the accuracy of predicting an individual's risk of CD or UC could be improved by jointly modeling EAS and EUR populations. Accordingly, the genetic diversity of the population plays a major role in GWAS for the equitable deployment of PRS in clinical settings.5 Susceptibility genes are significantly related to clinical manifestations, course of disease, and treatment response. Previous studies have shown that variants in nudix hydrolase 15 are associated with an increased risk of thiopurine-induced myelosuppression and that these variants have a great predictive power for thiopurine-induced myelosuppression.6 Precision and personalized medicine based on individual pharmacogenomic information enable the safe use of thiopurines by minimizing thiopurine-induced severe side effects (e.g. leukopenia and alopecia) in IBD patients. Moreover, the ATG16L1 genotype in CD patients largely affects the efficacy of corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and biological agents.7 As a canonical autophagy-regulating protein, ATG16L1 has been found to be downregulated in different types of tissues in Chinese CD patients, suggesting that a conjoint analysis of protein and gene enables us to screen more variants in different populations.8 Previous reports have shown that the IL-23R genotype is an optimal predictor of an early response to anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody (i.e., infliximab) in UC patients.9 Accumulating studies have tried to explore the association between the genetic characteristics and clinical phenotypes and outcome and found that nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing 2 (NOD2) gene polymorphisms are associated with age and complications of CD patients. Importantly, the most common genetic variant of ATG16L1 (rs2241880) is significantly associated with the development of CD perianal disease.7 Precision and personalized medicine is a hotspot of IBD study. The data converging multiple omics, data integration, computer networking models, and new clinical trials lay the foundation for precision medicine in the future.10 Liu et al. have highlighted the similarities and differences in the genetic architectures between EUR and EAS ancestries and pinpointed the clinical significances relevant to IBD genetic study for the first time.5 The latest research progress in genetic characteristics of IBD in Chinese and other EAS ancestries will help us to better understand the pathogenesis of IBD and provide precision medicine in these emerging regions with high incidences of disease, particularly in EAS countries (Figure 2). The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ATG16L1 T300A shows strong associations with disease subgroups in a large Australian IBD population: further support for significant disease heterogeneity

Glutathione S-Transferase T1 Null Genotype is Associated with Susceptibility to Inflammatory Bowel Disease

ATG16L1 T300A Polymorphism and Crohn’s Disease Susceptibility: Evidence from 13,022 Cases and 17,532 Controls

Association Of Abcb1 Polymorphisms And Ulcerative Colitis Susceptibility

ATG16L1 rs2241880/T300A increases susceptibility to perianal Crohn's disease: An updated meta‐analysis on inflammatory bowel disease risk and clinical outcomes

Susceptibility Gene Profiling Elucidates the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Provides Precision Medicine.

Trans-ancestry, Bayesian meta-analysis discovers 20 novel risk loci for inflammatory bowel disease in an African American, East Asian and European cohort

OP08 Multi-ancestry genome-wide association study of inflammatory bowel disease identifies 125 novel loci and directly implicates new genes in disease susceptibility

The Crohn's disease polymorphism, ATG16L1 T300A, alters the gut microbiota and enhances the local Th1/Th17 response

The Crohn’s disease polymorphism, ATG16L1 T300A, alters the gut microbiota and enhances the local Th1/Th17 response

ATG16L1: A multifunctional susceptibility factor in Crohn disease

Identification of A Common Variant with Potential Pleiotropic Effect on Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Colorectal Cancer

Deep Resequencing of GWAS Loci Identifies Rare Variants in CARD9, IL23R and RNF186 That Are Associated with Ulcerative Colitis

The Crohn Disease-associated ATG16L1 T300A polymorphism regulates inflammatory responses by modulating TLR- and NLR-mediated signaling

Genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for Crohn disease and implicates autophagy in disease pathogenesis

Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease

Association Between Variants of the Autophagy Related Gene - Irgm and Susceptibility to Crohn'S Disease and Ulcerative Colitis: A Meta-Analysis

ATG16L1 polymorphisms are associated with NOD2-induced hyperinflammation

Genetic Susceptibility to Ulcerative Colitis in the Chinese Han Ethnic Population: Association with Tnf Polymorphisms

Genetic polymorphism in ATG16L1 gene is associated with adalimumab use in inflammatory bowel disease

Confirmation of multiple Crohn's disease susceptibility loci in a large Dutch-Belgian cohort