Abstract:Light intensity (I) is the most dynamic and significant environmental variable affecting photosynthesis (An), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration (Tr), and water-use efficiency (WUE). Currently, studies characterizing leaf-scale WUE–I responses are rare and key questions have not been answered. In particular, (1) What shape does the response function take? (2) Are there maximum intrinsic (WUEi; WUEi–max) and instantaneous WUE (WUEinst; WUEinst–max) at the corresponding saturation irradiances (Ii–sat and Iinst–sat)? This study developed WUEi–I and WUEinst–I models sharing the same non-asymptotic function with previously published An–I and gs–I models. Observation-modeling intercomparison was conducted for field-grown plants of soybean (C3) and grain amaranth (C4) to assess the robustness of our models versus the non-rectangular hyperbola models (NH models). Both types of models can reproduce WUE–I curves well over light-limited range. However, at light-saturated range, NH models overestimated WUEi–max and WUEinst–max and cannot return Ii–sat and Iinst–sat due to its asymptotic function. Moreover, NH models cannot describe the down-regulation of WUE induced by high light, on which our models described well. The results showed that WUEi and WUEinst increased rapidly within low range of I, driven by uncoupled photosynthesis and stomatal responsiveness. Initial response rapidity of WUEi was higher than WUEinst because the greatest increase of An and Tr occurred at low gs. C4 species showed higher WUEi–max and WUEinst–max than C3 species—at similar Ii–sat and Iinst–sat. Our intercomparison highlighted larger discrepancy between WUEi–I and WUEinst–I responses in C3 than C4 species, quantitatively characterizing an important advantage of C4 photosynthetic pathway—higher An gain but lower Tr cost per unit of gs change. Our models can accurately return the wealth of key quantities defining species-specific WUE–I responses—besides An–I and gs–I responses. The key advantage is its robustness in characterizing these entangled responses over a wide I range from light-limited to light-inhibitory light intensities, through adopting the same analytical framework and the explicit and consistent definitions on these responses. Our models are of significance for physiologists and modelers—and also for breeders screening for genotypes concurrently achieving maximized photosynthesis and optimized WUE.

Estimation of Photosynthetic Induction Is Significantly Affected by Light Environments of Local Leaves and Whole Plants in Oryza Genus

Effects of contrasting N supplies on leaf photosynthetic induction under fluctuating light in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Transcriptomic Analysis of Photosynthesis‐related Genes Regulated by Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation in Flag Leaves of Rice

Increase rate of light-induced stomatal conductance is related to stomatal size in the genus Oryza

Aquaporin Expression and Water Transport Pathways inside Leaves Are Affected by Nitrogen Supply through Transpiration in Rice Plants

Characterization of the Photosynthetic Induction Response in A Populus Species with Stomata Barely Responding to Light Changes

Response of stomatal conductance, transpiration, and photosynthesis to light and CO2 for rice leaves with different appearance days

Variation of Photosynthetic Induction in Major Horticultural Crops Is Mostly Driven by Differences in Stomatal Traits

Contributions of species shade tolerance and individual light environment to photosynthetic induction in tropical tree seedlings

Photosynthetic induction and its diffusional, carboxylation and electron transport processes as affected by CO2 partial pressure, temperature, air humidity and blue irradiance

Diurnal and Seasonal Variations in the Photosynthetic Characteristics and the Gas Exchange Simulations of Two Rice Cultivars Grown at Ambient and Elevated CO2

A Mechanistic Model for Estimating Rice Photosynthetic Capacity and Stomatal Conductance from Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence.

Quantifying Light Response of Leaf-Scale Water-Use Efficiency and Its Interrelationships With Photosynthesis and Stomatal Conductance in C3 and C4 Species

Photosynthetic Properties and Potentials for Improvement of Photosynthesis in Pale Green Leaf Rice under High Light Conditions

Stomatal conductance in rice leaves and panicles responds differently to abscisic acid and soil drought

Mesophyll conductance exerts a significant limitation on photosynthesis during light induction

Seasonal variations in the relationship between sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic capacity from the leaf to canopy level in a rice crop

Initial stomatal conductance increases photosynthetic induction of trees leaves more from sunlit than from shaded environments: a meta-analysis

Inhibition of Photosynthesis and Energy Dissipation Induced by Water and High Light Stresses in Rice.

Effects of three patterns of elevated CO2 in single and multiple generations on photosynthesis and stomatal features in rice

Quantitative relationships between canopy spectral reflectance and leaf stomatal conductance in rice