Abstract:According to the fundamental theorems of welfare economics, any competitive equilibrium is Pareto efficient. Unfortunately, competitive equilibrium prices only exist under strong assumptions such as perfectly divisible goods and convex preferences. In many real-world markets, participants have non-convex preferences and the allocation problem needs to consider complex constraints. Electricity markets are a prime example, but similar problems appear in many real-world markets, which has led to a growing literature in market design. Power markets use heuristic pricing rules based on the dual of a relaxed allocation problem today. With increasing levels of renewables, these rules have come under scrutiny as they lead to high out-of-market side-payments to some participants and to inadequate congestion signals. We show that existing pricing heuristics optimize specific design goals that can be conflicting. The trade-offs can be substantial, and we establish that the design of pricing rules is fundamentally a multi-objective optimization problem addressing different incentives. In addition to traditional multi-objective optimization techniques using weighing of individual objectives, we introduce a novel parameter-free pricing rule that minimizes incentives for market participants to deviate locally. Our theoretical and experimental findings show how the new pricing rule capitalizes on the upsides of existing pricing rules under scrutiny today. It leads to prices that incur low make-whole payments while providing adequate congestion signals and low lost opportunity costs. Our suggested pricing rule does not require weighing of objectives, it is computationally scalable, and balances trade-offs in a principled manner, addressing an important policy issue in electricity markets.

A pricing mechanism to jointly mitigate market power and environmental externalities in electricity markets

Incentive-Compatible Market Clearing for a Two-Stage Integrated Electricity-Gas-Heat Market

Market Mechanisms for Low-Carbon Electricity Investments: A Game-Theoretical Analysis

Bilaterally Open Electricity Markets with High Penetration of Renewables

A market mechanism for electric power transmission

Iterative Mechanisms for Electricity Markets

Pricing Optimal Outcomes in Coupled and Non-Convex Markets: Theory and Applications to Electricity Markets

Achieving Social Optimum and Budget Balance via a Joint Electricity-Carbon Pricing Mechanism

Dual Pricing to Prioritize Renewable Energy and Consumer Preferences in Electricity Markets

An Energy Sharing Mechanism Considering Network Constraints and Market Power Limitation

Pricing And Market Clearing Mechanism Based On Consumer Payment And Generation Bid Cost Minimization

Research on incentive bidding mechanism to coordinate the electric power and emission–reduction of the generator

Strategic trading equilibria in local community considering co-existence of pool-based and peer-to-peer energy markets with free-rider problem in network usage cost

Market Power Mitigation Clearing Mechanism Based on Constrained Bidding Capacities

Exploring Integrated Demand Elasticity for Market Power Mitigation

Network-Aware and Welfare-Maximizing Dynamic Pricing for Energy Sharing

Power-Electronics-Enabled Transactive Energy Market Design for Distribution Networks

Mitigation-Aware Bidding Strategies in Electricity Markets

A Decentralized Market Mechanism for Energy Communities under Operating Envelopes

Transaction Path-based Market Clearing and Pricing Mechanism Design in Interregional Power Markets

A Two-Stage Emission Mismatch Penalty Game to Facilitate Carbon and Electricity Market Interaction